advertisement
advertisement

Top Stories


advertisement

In-Store


What Does Subway’s Contactless Trial Mean For Payment?

May 4th, 2009

Subway, the 31,000-store sandwich restaurant chain, has agreed to be the latest guinea pig for Visa’s contactless payment program. Subway confirmed Thursday (April 30) that it will soon make the payment technology available to “participating” locations in Canada. Subway has about 2,400 stores in Canada, many of which are franchised.

Typically, statements announcing such deals (which, in this case, included Subway’s acquirer for its stores in Canada, Chase Paymentech) feature a canned quote from an executive with the chain, praising the vendor for its wisdom. In this case, the quote provided by Subway was anything but warm.

Read more...

advertisement

Office Depot Integrates CRM, Payment Into A Printer

April 29th, 2009

A self-service printer that accepts payment cards is not extraordinary, but Office Depot is taking the next step by enabling customers to use their loyalty cards, gift cards, coupons and tax IDs.

With the business clientele, the ability for self-service systems to award points for purchases is important, but not necessarily as important as allowing customized screens delivering different options for employees of different companies, said Jay Eisenberg, a senior marketing director for the $14.5 billion 1,713-store office supply chain. The trick was in how to identify the customer given that the printer was initially only outfitted with a magstripe reader.

Read more...

advertisement

Demand For POS Units Still Growing In Emerging Asia/Pacific

April 29th, 2009

The developing retail markets of China and India are hungry for new point-of-sale units and that’s making the Asia/Pacific region one of the few places in the world likely to see any near-term increase in POS shipments, according to the IHL Group. The analysts portray their findings as good news for POS makers, especially given the stagnant POS market most everywhere else (including Japan).

Although IHL’s projection of “strong growth” for POS units in China and India should not have an immediate impact on POS pricetags, a secondary effect just might.

Read more...

advertisement

Borders’ In-Store-Only Coupons Sign Of A Much Bigger Problem

April 29th, 2009

Starting in February, Borders quietly changed how it handled its coupons, changing them from being available for both in-store and online orders to solely in-store. In and of itself, that’s not so surprising, especially given that the $3 billion chain that month all-but-halted meaningful E-Commerce investments. But the move to push all sales into the stores runs counter to customer desires, which is rarely a good longterm strategy.

But that may be precisely the point. With the economy still scraping bottom, many retailers and E-tailers are having to craft strategies that are designed to be very temporary and very emergent. There’s a major E-Commerce vendor, for example, that is out there trying to convince retailers to halt efforts to bring in new sales, proposing that they instead force all efforts on the installed base. This forces us to consider three distinct issues.

Read more...

advertisement

Motorola Rolls Out “Me, Too” Small RFID Reader

April 28th, 2009

Riding small CPUs enabling much smaller form factors, Motorola on Tuesday (April 28) a 1.8-pound fixed RFID reader measuring 7.7 inches long, 5.9 inches wide and 1.7 inches deep. The vendor described the FX7400 series units as being “less than half the size of traditional fixed RFID readers, making it ideal for retail stores and other customer-facing environments.”

But analysts were less than impressed, pointing out that the Motorola units were actually larger than many other major RFID readers today, despite being smaller than other Motorola RFID readers. “I definitely classify this as ‘ho hum.’ ThingMagic and Impinj as well as some others have much smaller form factors and more functions,” said Pete Abell, a longtime RFID analyst (used to be with IDC) who today works as an independent consultant.

Read more...

Starbucks Goes To Mexico To Test Mobile Coupons

April 27th, 2009

Starbucks is boasting of a 60 percent redemption rate on a mobile coupon trial being done in Mexico, where customers send SMS messages to access 2D barcode mobile coupons. That is an unusually—suspiciously?—high redemption rate, especially for a mobile program.

“Every time you present your coupon, the offer would be modified, such as get a venti for the price of a tall, to make people come more often to the store,” said this story from Mobile Marketer. “The call-to-action urged consumers to text keyword STARBUCKS to short code 80080 to get a WAP link to download a buy-one-get-one-free 2D barcode mobile coupon. Starbucks is equipped with 2D bar code recognition software, so employees can read the mobile coupon directly from consumers’ mobile phones at the point of sale.”


J.C. Penney IT Focused Now On In-Store

April 23rd, 2009

J.C. Penney is the latest retailer to conclude that the deadly economy means that in-store must, for the moment, get unconditional IT priority. J.C. Penney CEO Myron Ullman was explicit about a change in tech priorities as he prepared for his shareholders meeting this week.

” I’m saying IT isn’t the back door. It’s the front door,” Ullman said in an interview with the Dallas Morning News. The story continued: ” Penney has decided dot-com isn’t the hub anymore. It has put information technology at the same level with store operations, merchandising and marketing when planning the company’s future.”


Is Blockbuster’s Kiosk Move Too Late?

April 23rd, 2009

The neighborhood physical video rental business is in a very difficult position these days. Blockbuster is trying to survive with a kiosk strategy, courtesy of an NCR acquisition of a large operator of video rental kiosks.

But is this too little, ludicrously too late? A nice discussion happened Wednesday (April 23) at RetailWire about the Blockbuster strategy. My favorite comment comes from author Ryan Mathews from Black Monk Consulting: ” Blockbuster stumbled because the notion of physical access became less important in the video rental business. Does creating another physical solution change all that? I don’t think so.” The discussion is worth a read.


Why Most PCI Self-Assessments Are Wrong

April 23rd, 2009

The reason that so many PCI self-assessments are wrong is that they focus on the mainstream business processes of the company. They often ignore a lot of “back-channel” or “just-in-case” practices that result in card data coming into the company not protected by the various PCI and other data security measures to protect more mainstream applications, data repositories and processes.

GuestView PCI Columnist David Taylor said the problems crop up in easy-to-miss ways and he rattles off three of his favorites.

Read more...

Washington State Enacts “Reasonable” RFID Privacy Law

April 22nd, 2009

Washington State’s governor has signed into law one of three bills relating to RFID and privacy, a measure that prohibits, with a dozen exceptions, the scanning of RFID chips by anybody other than the company that attached them.

The signed bill includes a number of significant changes to the initially-proposed measure which was denounced in January by Dan Mullen, President of the Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility (AIM), as potentially being “traumatic” to retailers and consumers. Mullen, according to an RFID Journal report, believes the enacted version is “pretty reasonable” because it focuses on banning the surreptitious scanning and reading of RFID chips, as opposed to the devices directly.


The End Of An Era? Will Chains Soon Bag Bags?

April 20th, 2009

This is one of those end-of-an-era markers. A 31-store Colorado grocery chain with stores in Colorado, New Mexico, Texas and Utah is claiming—and it seems like a very plausible claim—that it is the first chain to go entirely bag free, insisting that customers use either reusable cloth bags or less convenient cardboard boxes. To be fair, the Natural Grocers chain is an all-natural chain, which borders on being a healthfood chain, so it’s rejection of paper and plastic bags certainly may not indicate a national trend.

Still, the cost-savings above and beyond environmental issues are fairly significant, not to mention that packing cloth bags is likely to be slightly faster as they are sturdier and can hold more. But it also discourages last-minute shopping, at least at that chain.


A Different Approach To An Interactive Billboard

April 19th, 2009

This is one of these ideas that could work extremely well in a very limited set of circumstances. A whisky company opted to put up a billboard in a densely-populated and traveled urban area and wanted it to change–very significantly–with every person who saw it, tailoring to that person. The problem is that it can’t scale, requires workers on site (and workers who can craft ad copy on the fly, with literally seconds to create) and is likely quite expensive.

Still, as this video of Jameson’s truly interactive billboard illustrates, the marketing tactic can break through the clutter of a message-laden environment. And it’s hard to argue with the potential of a billboard that–as shown in the video–hailed a cab for a prospect. But could it be practical for in-store use? Maybe at a large mall? And what of the flip side: Are there consumers who would be alienated by having such a public message directed at them? And what if it was connected with CRM, allowing for personalization beyond that which can be observed? In this day of digital messages overflowing consumers’ cellphones, Web screens and shopping carts, it’s absolutely a concept not be dismissed too quickly.


Grocery Chain Connects TV Tracking And POS Data

April 16th, 2009

A grocery chain has gotten involved in a deal where it is sharing extensive POS customer data with a business that is marrying that data with those same consumers’ entertainment-watching history. The goal? To overlay the two to see what those consumers are buying after they watch certain entertainment shows or commercials.

In this particular effort, the retailer has chosen to mask the individual consumer identities—for now—and is trying to draw general conclusions based on the actions of people in that Zip Code. But the technology was there for them to tie everything back to the individual consumer, raising quite a few data and privacy strategy issues.

Read more...

Will DataBar Kill The Self-Checkout Produce, Coupon Nightmare?

April 16th, 2009

Grocery chains have for years struggled with self-checkout systems that couldn’t easily deal with produce, POS stations that simply couldn’t handle complicated coupons and barcodes that didn’t understand expiration dates. But in a move that many in retail IT see as the potentially biggest change in product labeling since the rollout of the UPC barcode 35 years ago, the GS1 DataBar is looking to sharply increase its retail presence as of January. Among the chains most vocally advocating for the advance are American chains Walmart, Winn-Dixie and Krogers plus Canada’s Loblaw.

At its core, the DataBar codes are today’s barcodes but are much more tightly packed with much more information. But not all of this transition will be akin to scanning sugar and spice. Most chains will have to absorb non-trivial costs to support the upgrades, a tricky move at a time of store closings and massive layoffs. Most product scanners built since 2000 are capable of reading DataBars but investments need to be made beyond just the scanners.

Read more...

Data Security Slugfest: Tokenization Vs End-to-End Encryption

April 15th, 2009

In a land “Beyond PCI,” there’s trouble brewing. Issues involving everything from tokenization to end-to-end encryption are being debated and the PCI SSC is hiring a consulting firm to look into the implications of these (and other) technologies and processes.

This all raises the issue of “should retailers wait for the PCI SSC to ‘bless’ or integrate so called ‘beyond PCI’ technologies into the standards?” GuestView PCI Columnist David Taylor’s answer is a profound “no.”

Read more...

The Browser Giveth, The Browser Taketh Away

April 14th, 2009

Execs at Domino’s Pizza learned a painful lesson in the power of Web video and social networks this week. Although the chain already understood the power of those new channels to sell product and boost brand loyalty, it seemed to have been offguard how those channels could just as easily halt sales and hurt brand loyalty. It also seemed stunned that the powerful national chain could be undone by a 10-minute effort from two low-level employees.

The story—deliciously told here by The New York Times—involves two workers at one restaurant that posted a video of them doing some impressively unsanitary things to a pizza before he was sent. See the picture accompanying this story? All I can say is that that had better be cheese.


Does New Media Demand New Metrics?

April 9th, 2009

Ran into a marketing exec who came up with a wonderfully different measuring approach for evaluating social networking sites. Understanding that social media is about influence, persuasion, he did a very informal study (resources: a pair of interns) of his targeted social site. The project was to count up every time anyone on the site referenced one of their brands and to note whether the reference was favorable, unfavorable or neutral.

After tracking that for an extended period and noting the ebbs and flows, he then ran a major campaign. But instead of looking at impressions, clickthrough, leads generated or any other typical Web metric, he simply repeated his study. The only test of a social site marketing campaign, he reasoned, is to see if it was changing the dialogue at all. Were his brands getting talked about more? And was it boosting his favorable and dropping his negatives?

Read more...

POS As The Great Protector

April 8th, 2009

The POS system is the Rodney Dangerfield of the retail IT world: It gets no respect. (Could have gone back yet further and said it was the Red Buttons of the retail IT world because it never gets a dinner, but that’s an even more obscure pop culture reference.)

Chains are just starting to see the business ROI potential of POS—especially when working with CRM—to fuel upsells and to legitimately increase loyalty. But few look at POS as a potential protector and a protector against some potentially very large expenses. Consider four items from the last few days.

Read more...

Macy’s Cites Privacy In Fighting D.A.’s CRM, POS Subpoena

April 8th, 2009

Fighting a subpoena for CRM and POS data from the Los Angeles District Attorney, Macy’s attorneys are arguing that privacy expectations prevent them from revealing the names of their customers who purchased children’s jewelry made with potentially toxic lead. The D.A. argues that it needs the names so that the consumers can be contacted to try and stop the health threat.

The case raises many critical retail IT issues, including how private—or proprietary—the courts should consider data, including purchase histories from CRM/loyalty and POS payment files. Beyond privacy issues, such subpoenas could force retailers to publicly reveal that they are collecting and saving a lot more information than they want to disclose. There are also PCI implications, where a merchant could theoretically be shown to be saving prohibited payment card data.

Read more...

Grocery Chain Tries Loyalty Card With 7-Day Price Guarantee

April 8th, 2009

Shoppers with RFID-enabled loyalty cards from a chain of Washington State grocery stores get their accounts automatically credited the price difference, plus 1 percent, if products they buy go on sale within a week of their shopping trips. Now there’s an incentive to use the cards. The program is being trialed at the Top Food & Drug chain, which owns 33 supermarkets in Washington and Oregon under the TOP Food & Drug, Haggen Food & Pharmacy and Larry’s Market names.

“If you buy milk for $4 on Tuesday and the provider sells it on Thursday for $3.50, you get an E-mail saying you’ve got fifty cents in your account based on the fact we put this on sale,” said Peter Gruman, president of Accelitec, a vendor involved in the program. “The next time the customer visits the store and taps his loyalty card at the POS, the cashier will see he has fifty cents credit and will ask if he wants to apply it to the sale or let it remain in the account.” The program also provides no-questions-asked automated refunds for products with quality problems. If a loyalty card holder finds the milk was sour, he can call the store and ask for a refund, which will also be credited directly to the CRM card.


Retail Lawyers And Coupons Don’t Mix

April 7th, 2009

Macy’s and J.C. Penney apparently let their lawyers loose on a recent batch of consumer coupons, with some wonderfully unintentionally humorous results. And The Consumerist, now owned by Consumer Reports, had more fun than any media outlet should be allowed to have. With Macy’s, it was an impressively lengthy list of exemptions that merited the attention.

The list of exemptions on J.C. Penney’s coupon was much shorter and they probably would have been left alone had some marketer not insisted in a bold coupon declaration of “No exclusions” right next to a healthy list of exclusions.


Calvin Klein’s Approach-Avoidance E-Commerce Challenge

April 5th, 2009

When Calvin Klein brands, the diversified apparel line that sold almost $6 billion worth of clothing last year for parent company Phillips-Van Heusen, launched its first E-Commerce site six months ago, it had to deal with the same channel conflict issues for any business so dependent on its retail distributors. But instead of seeing a lot of sales shift from in-store to online, it found an increase in revenue as younger consumers embraced the brand online. “Our sense is that this (Web) consumer skews a little younger than the department store channel,” said Tom Murry, president/CEO of Calvin Klein Inc..

But from a strategic marketing perspective, Calvin Klein’s approach-avoidance relationship with E-Commerce and New Media is fascinating. They waited more than a decade to get into E-Commerce, even though they wanted that audience. Even when they did launch, they’re hesitant to go mobile and social. And yet, this is the same fearless company that pushed the envelope—many would say blew past that envelope—of good taste in X-rated advertisements, trying to stir up attention among younger consumers. That’s fine, of course, but it hardly fits the profile of a brand that is scared to move into mobile and social in 2009.

Read more...

What Does Subway’s Contactless Trial Mean For Payment?

April 3rd, 2009

Subway, the 31,000-store sandwich restaurant chain, has agreed to be the latest guinea pig for Visa’s contactless payment program. Subway confirmed Thursday (April 30) that it will soon make the payment technology available to “participating” locations in Canada. Subway has about 2,400 stores in Canada, many of which are franchised.

Typically, statements announcing such deals (which, in this case, included Subway’s acquirer for its stores in Canada, Chase Paymentech) feature a canned quote from an executive with the chain, praising the vendor for their wisdom. In this case, the quote provided by Subway was anything but warm.

Read more...

Federal Appellate Panel Sends TJX Case Back To Court, Move Likely To Cost TJX Millions More

April 2nd, 2009

When a federal appellate ruled on Monday (March 30) that it was sending a small part of one of the civil lawsuits involving TJX’s death breach back to the district court, it was a very narrow decision. But the act of sending it back and allowing for discovery to start again is likely to force TJX to spend millions more, according to attorneys watching the case. Perhaps even more importantly, the ruling is likely to slightly alter the risk-cost balance of retail security, putting just a little more pressure on chains to invest in their security operations.

It is true that discovery can be frightening for typical companies involved in class-action civil lawsuits, but for TJX, it can be positively terrifying. Throughout two trials, TJX showed itself to be far more worried about revealing thus-far-unreleased security details than monetary payments or almost anything else.

Read more...

With End-to-End Encryption, Whose End Is Getting Protected?

April 2nd, 2009

In a piece last week, we talked about a series of future security offerings that Visa is pushing, including a comment from a Fifth Third Bank executive that end-to-end encryption has logistical challenges, especially “a tremendous key management issue.”

One reader argued that Fifth Third’s resistance had much less to do with making life easier for retailers and more to do with minimizing the processor’s own liability. “Fifth Third sees a major transfer of card fraud liability shifting exclusively to them from the merchant who traditionally has (effectively) 100 percent of the liability. This dynamic would leave Fifth Third (and all acquirers) as the sole liability holder for all card fraud,” wrote one reader. “I can understand their concern. It is rational and it is well-founded.”

Read more...

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...
The ETA recently launched the Certified Payment Professional program, which charges $425 for non-members to take the test, assuming they meet the 'experience' requirement, to PROVE they are a professional. And they'll have to take it every 3 years. Worthy program, but high cost. Plus, only a select few were allowed to be in the first class, and there are only 4 test windows per year currently. So being on the registry simply means, you were lucky enough to get picked, nothing to do with skill level. Read more...
@Cory: Thanks for your comment and question about the pricing of the QIR training. I raised that question in a conversation with Bob Russo last week, and I will address it in a follow-up column in a few days. While the pricing is not yet set, hopefully it will not be too great a burden for you or other integrators/resellers. We'll have to see, though. Read more...

Costco Self-Checkout Trial Setback After Store Losses

Not all self checkout works this way. One self checkout vendor is designed to work this way and it leaves a gaping security problem that can create this situation. There are 3 predominant providers of self checkout in the U.S. and this represents the lowest installed base provider of the 3 and their market share continues to shrink from reports I have seen. Read more...
Editor's Note; The vendor that Mark was referencing is IBM. His point is that other systems make it easier for any weight mismatches to require associate intervention--just like with alcohol or cigarettes or any other age-restricted item--rather than a more passive flag to the customer that the item was excluded. Read more...
Another angle on the challenges with self checkout which may come to the retail scene in the next year is the tap and go/NFC smart phones. Though these are all the rage in Japan, we have yet to adopt them in the U.S.. But that will change as the new phones emerge with the chips embedded this year. And the new demographic want to use this type of technology. A large retailer told us that NFC phone customers are getting their identities stolen, even though the self check-out requires proximity-- and they do not want to take responsibility for this occurrence in their stores, on their premises. So although they like the idea self check-out they are still experimenting with various approaches. Read more...
ed
For self checkout, item-level RFID or unique barcodes plus real-time tracking appears to be the missing component. Mail delivery companies use real-time tracking of mail with a barcode and assure delivery at a certain time. The public library embed books with RFID and track them through checkout. Retailers and SCO manufacturers are going to have to accept the fact they cannot rely on UPC and really need an item-level identifier that tract that specific product as a unique item from shelving to checkout. Read more...

Visa Yanks Global Payments' PCI Compliance. Catch-22 In Full Force

So PCI compliance can not guarantee that a provider will not be breached, but a breach is inherent evidence of non-compliance? Any comment from VISA as to whether they will continue to accept ROCs prepared by Trustwave? Seems like an inconsistent position. Read more...
Thu
Global Payments reported they were working toward being in compliance with PCI, despite already being on the list. In a backwards way, they admitted they were not previously in compliance. We can't really say that a breach is inherent in these type of situations without having a full investigation report. That's one reason why MasterCard is waiting to see what forensics finds before yanking them from their list. Read more...
In the past, Visa has stated, "No compromised entity to date has been found to be in compliance with PCI DSS at the time of the breach. In all cases, forensic investigations have concluded that compliance deficiencies have been a major contributor to the breach." This quote can be taken two ways. Either PCI is perfect and all-encompassing and compliance guarantees you won't be breached; or there are so many “gotchas” in PCI that no one can escape non-compliance. I personally believe that PCI is written in such a way — and interpretations among QSAs vary so much — as to make it impossible for anyone to be 100 percent compliant 100 percent of the time. Read more...
PCI, TSA, IRS - obviously none of these functions as intended or as promoted. I've said it before and I say it again, hackers are free of personnel, budget, expertise, infrastructure and time constrains. Nothing, NOTHING, is ever fully safe. Visa and its attorneys simply choose to hide behind the false sense of security of the PCI veil. Truth be known, Visa has probably been hacked. Anyone see the similarities between VISA and the wizard of OZ? Read more...
This begs the question, how does this decision by Visa affect Third Party Processors (TPA's)? Our TPA agreement has wording to the effect that we can only send CHD to PCI compliant processors and banks. Now that Visa has deemed GPS non-compliant, are we breaking our TPA agreement by allowing our customers to continue using GPS? Read more...

How About A Little Service Provider Responsibility Here, PCI-Wise?

I appreciate the one-sideness issue highlighted in this article. I also understand how card brands have a contractual link to merchants - but only rarely do with service providers. I'd find it virtually meaningless for the PCI requirement to mandate actions by the service provider, when they have no contracted responsibility to a commercial entity. That said, 12.8.4 places an obligation on the service provider to demonstrate compliance to their customer the merchant (or service provider, Acquirer etc). Is not the combination of these 2 requirements having the same outcome? Read more...
Lem
PCI is like banging your head on the wall. When you complete the SAQ, it feels good stopping. Read more...
Actually, service providers do have direct links to the card brands. For example, many have direct system connections/access points to the card networks. More importantly, all service providers validate their PCI compliance to the card brands. The brands (at least Visa and MasterCard) also post lists of compliant Level 1 Service Providers on their websites. My point was not so much about the card brands, though. I was observing that since PCI already has a number of requirements that only apply only to Service Providers and not to merchants, there is precedent for one more Service-provider-only requirement to cure the imbalance I noted. Read more...
Walt, I'd suggest that perhaps you have a limited concept of who would be considered a Service Provider under the guidelines that you've suggested. The fact is that most resellers/integrators do NOT have direct links to the card brands or the card networks. They may work with processors to board new merchants or provide support, but there is no contractual or legal obligation at all. Your comment that all service provides validate their PCI compliance is also way off base if you include resellers & integrators. The limited number of Level 1 Service Providers probably do validate their compliance, but the vast majority of resellers/integrators are not that big. Read more...

The Never-Ending Dance Of Contactless Security

ed
Contactless should require multi-factor authentication for financial transactions. However, multi-factor authentication will nullify the main benefit of contactless transactions which is speed. Is there really an improvement between a mag swipe and contactless tap if multi-factor authentication is required? Read more...
Contactless card transactions are verfied online, if there is fraud the bank with take the liablity. This does not happen with checks, bills. Oh and contactless is faster than any other form of payment and you do not have to check the takings at the end of the day: so faster service and a bit more secure. Read more...
MC
To contaftless. Not completly true that the bank will take the hit for a fraudulant contactless transaction. When paying at the fuel pump with contactless, you will have a defined pre-auth limit which is set by the issuer and obtain an online auth number. Even with the issuer providing real time auth, should the customer dispute the transaction, the liability and burden of proof still lies with the retailer in most circumstances. To the issuer they claim this is a "card not present" transaction if completed out of sight of the store attendant. Add that to the fact that that a gas station forecourt allows the hiding of the necessary fraudulant transaction supporting equipment inside a vehicle, it creates the anoynmous environment that fraudsters prefer to operate under. Read more...

The PayPal Problem: Will It Impact Retailers' PCI Scope?

For the foreseeable future, retailers are not going to be transacting exclusively against PayPal accounts. Therefore, with the assumption that the payments are stored, transmitted and processed through the same systems as "regular" CHD, there will be no change in scope. Merchants will have to protect the PayPal payment information with the same rigour as PANs/CV2s/tokens, but this isn't arduous because they are doing it right now. (Or should be.) Read more...
This is the problem with the notion of the high value token wording in September's guidelines. As you rightly point out an email address, mobile no. or even a name can be considered a high value token. Yet by their very nature these are all readily available in the public domain, so I find it hard for them to be considered as a high value token. Read more...
Will Visa be including in their V.me system the additional ability for online payers to source funds via a “debit” transaction from their banking account, rather than only by a credit card transaction as has been the case in the past because of the PIN requirement for such a “debit” transaction? After all, what’s the difference between a PIN, that Visa/MasterCard already hold, and a password required to access a secure online payments gateway? Read more...
The PayPal user information is much more "high value" because it can be used across merchants to initiate transactions. If I have it or gain access to it via a merchant compromise, there is nothing to stop me from using it at another merchant. A properly designed tokenization system should have rules that prohibit tokens obtained from one merchant to be used at another merchant and/or prohibit initiating transactions unless the PAN and authentication data has been previously received by that merchant. Read more...
A big difference with PINs(at least in the debit world) is that they should only be entered into an encrypting PIN Pad. The feeling goes that if I steal a card with a valid PIN I can go to an unattended device(ATM) and pull out money w/o having to present a legitimate card to a person. I suppose you could make the same case(which you did) regarding an online transaction w/ a password. Read more...
PayPal's plan of POS attack is to entice merchants with below-cost credit and debit card processing, which is an offer no retailer will refuse. The company will subsidize its losses from the card transactions with the very high-margin profits it enjoys when its users fund the sales amount from their bank accounts. On the other hand, whether the consumers will be won over is another question altogether. If it is to stand a chance, PayPal will need to make the checkout process as uneventful as possible. As it is, the customer is asked to enter his or her cell phone number, in addition to a PIN, before the transaction can be completed. That's unnecessary and excessive. Read more...

Tokens Are Not The Same As Encryption. Honest

I agree with all your points on how the technologies differ. The only possible disagreement I have is that you are very generous in giving PCI credit for distinguishing the differences between the two technologies and scope whereas I think they caused the confusion (or at least didn't help). Read more...
I tend to disagree that tokenisation and encryption are different - indeed, I see tokenisation as a form of bespoke encryption. Many of the arguments I hear about tokenisation being different from encryption leads to concerns about the security of encryption, or that encryption can be reversed. Although it is true that encryption can be reversed with the key, I strongly dispute the arguments about the security of encryption, and personally I put much more faith in an algorithm that has undergone many decades of community research, where the security (key) can be isolated in approved hardware, than in a bespoke solution I have no visibility or independent assurance of. Read more...
"High-value tokens are those that can be used to initiate a new card transaction." Personally, I didn't understand this part of the doc. Surely that's the point of a token, so I'm assuming they mean a token that can be used independently of a 'vault' type of service to initiate and complete a transaction. Otherwise, every token would be a High Value token. Services like Square's card case where a person's name can trigger a payment, or PayPal's where an email and password trigger a card payment. In these cases a name and email would be tokens and as they are initiating a card payment could be considered a High Value token. Read more...
I disagree with you on the point you made about there being no way from a PCI scoping perspective to compare tokenization guidance to encryption clarification. The parallel that I see is not between tokenization and encryption, but between the token and the encrypted data values themselves. Semantics? Maybe, but I believe there is a significant if not subtle difference between these two statements. Read more...
How can QSA be comfortable determining if something is out of scope, if he or she does not know how the system providing that benefit explicitly works in all conditions over its lifetime, especially if its distributed and may its functionality and risk profile may change over time and can be explicitly guaranteed? A QSA takes liability for such a de-scoping claim. Only proofs of security and evidence can stand behind that something seriously lacking in most of the debate. Read more...
Tokenization is a use case of data transformation, not a specific technology. Humans have been practicing tokenization using multiple methods for centuries and claiming that one method of data transformation is the "real" tokenization and not some other way doesn't make sense. Tokenization must be reversible. Read more...
Promises of incremental sales and the ability to target loyalty have been completely worn out by endless pitches of card services, hardware, software, etc etc etc... Another watershed way of getting mobile payments introduced is to shift merchant's payment modes from higher to lower cost products. I think ISIS has started down a path that completely misses that opportunity by partnering with incumbents who have zero interest in reducing merchant payment costs. Read more...

Want To Push Social Media? Have You Considered Using Your Stores?

What about if the retailer is in a shared space (e.g., a food court in a mall or college campus) where there may be limited space and possibly limited flexibility (e.g., power, comms, lease restrictions)? Or in airports, where I see more and more retailers. Would your recommendations hold for those locations, too? By coincidence, I was at a conference this week and sat next to the person charged with building brand awareness for a national food chain on college campuses -- and therefore with the student demographic -- nationwide. After reading your piece, I was wondering, would your recommendations would hold for them? As for airports, I could see one school of thought that says customers don't live there, so get them in and out. But I also could see where the particulars of this demographic could be sufficiently compelling to want to reach out. Read more...
I agree that there are even deeper levels of engagement that you absolutely could drive in the store (I love the idea of floating coupons by the way). I think what is most important is using the store to start a conversation that could be then continued online (rather than always trying to start a conversation online that culminates with a sale in the store). Read more...
I think the statement "Then there is the small fact that the retail operator doesn’t feed his family based upon how well his customers are engaged online" speaks loads. Read more...

Publix Buy-Online-Pick-Up-In-Store Trial Nixed: Grocery Shoppers Are Different

Your take on the customer's view is right, however I wonder whether supermarkets can go a _long_ way towards resolving it with easy, quick refunds? My partner unpacked our home-delivered fruit and veg box last week, and discovered bruised fruit. Took a picture, emailed the company, and within 10 minutes had a refund. Happy customer all round - the company cares, etc. This requires very careful thinking on the merchant's part about how to invest in this area of customer service. However, since it is equally easy for my partner's picture of bruised oranges to be uploaded to a social media site as it is to email the company, the downsides for NOT doing this are quite large. Read more...
What about the other non tangible benefits of shopping at the grocery store - it gets you out of the house and you get to interact with the staff. for many people this might be there only "human contact" in a day, or at least human contact that doesnt come with the stresses associated with family/work colleagues/customers. And of course, there is the primeval "hunting and gathering food" aspect. Read more...
ed
The last poster hit it head on - there is a primal "hunter" instinct of us humans preventing the buy groceries online model to take off. Food, clothing and shelter are the three things we humans go out and scavenge for and that is in our primal instinct. It appears the next logical step is to focus on items that do not interfere with our primal instincts such as prepackaged food or personal hygiene. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.