Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Supermarkets Spend Big On IT, Preparing To Fight Wal-Mart
advertisement
advertisement

Supermarkets Spend Big On IT, Preparing To Fight Wal-Mart

Written by Evan Schuman
August 8th, 2007
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

With many trying to out-service and out-specialize Wal-Mart, grocery chains are looking to spend more than $9 billion over the next year, according to a new report from the IHL Consulting Group.

The grocery segment is consolidating through a series of closing and mergers, but the report says this may prove difficult for IT departments, at the exact time that IT will need to perform most rapidly.

“One aspect of mergers and acquisitions that doesn?t get much press is the IT impact of two (or more) supermarket companies coming together. More often than not, this involves different backoffice systems having to learn how to talk to a single headquarters system,” the report said. “Further down the line, the POS systems must be configured so that the same data can be forwarded down the line and that price changes, taxes and WIC (Women, Infants and Children) products identifications must be continuously accurate. Although open systems are beginning to be far more common in the supermarket segment, the amount of legacy hardware and software at the store level is often a nightmare for the IT organization of the acquiring company.”

One of the big trouble spots that IHL saw for grocery chains is the lackluster performance of many loyalty programs, which IHL President Greg Buzek attributes to most retailers deploying the packages poorly.

The programs are generally used more as discount programs (“come in with your card and you’ll get discounts on 400 specially-marked items”) than as an attempt to understand individual customer’s buying habits and to make their experiences better, Buzek said.

Even the few chains that Buzek argues have deployed loyalty programs properly?including Meijer, Stop n Shop, Smart n Final and Safeway?have dropped the ball when it comes to letting customers know about the benefits being delivered.

For example, let’s say a chain analyzes purchases at the end of the month and a manager is preparing to discontinue the weakest-selling products. Before doing so, the manager cross-checks the purchase history of those products with the purchase history of the store’s 50 best customers. If Mrs. Jones happens to be the 9th top customer and she routinely purchases one of the low-selling products, the manager could choose to keep that product stocked so that the store doesn’t give Mrs. Jones a reason to shop elsewhere.

But the benefit to the store would only truly be realized if Mrs. Jones knew about it. She needs to be told that the store is still selling the Avacado-flavored toothpaste solely because she is highly valued as a customer. If the store did that, it would actually have created loyalty.

Buzek points out that loyalty programs only works if it’s seen as a two-way street. Often, grocery customers say “I gave you my information. Why am I not getting offers and discounts for the things I already buy?” Buzek said.

“Although successful in Europe and parts of the western U.S., loyalty programs have struggled to catch on in much of America. Some retailers have launched loyalty programs only to back out or marginalize them due to low customer participation. Others remain hesitant to implement,” the report said. “Some customers are suspicious of giving the local grocery more information (does this mean more junkmail?) while others just don?t want one more card to carry in their wallets. Loyalty programs must be clearly defined, well marketed and provide immediate added value to customers to insure adoption and successful implementation.”

But tech spending is still a grocery priority. “Supermarkets spent some $9.1 billion on IT in 2006, which is more than all but the Specialty Hard Goods and Convenience Store segments,” the report said. “Hardware accounted for the largest part of this, about $3.4 billion (37 percent, of which Infrastructure and Store Systems make up the bulk). Services account for $2.7 billion (29 percent) and Software $724 Million (8 percent).”

The report identified Point Of Sale hardware as another ripe area for grocery IT spending, as some POS systems “are now reaching 10-12 years of age and are due to be replaced in the next two years. By our estimates, there are more than 100,000 POC units that can be replaced in the next three years.”


advertisement

One Comment | Read Supermarkets Spend Big On IT, Preparing To Fight Wal-Mart

  1. Paul Mallon Says:

    What most retailers forget is the last yard of the supply chain. I heard an interesting quote from a retailer in the UK who said “It costs me more to get a bottle of wine from the stock room to the shelf than it does from Australia to my stock room!”. As always, the final yard is the most difficult but it offers retailers a real way to improve the customer experience. Have the right product on the shelf…and if you need to bring it from the stockroom then do it quickly and efficiently.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...