advertisement
advertisement


Amazon, Facebook: Retailers Want IT Leaders That Don’t Lead

Written by Evan Schuman
March 4th, 2009
Many major retailers have been criticized for being slow to adapt to industry—especially Web-based—changes. But it's not hard to see why when we see how the industry treats e-tail pioneers such as Amazon and Facebook. To be fair, both Amazon and Facebook got spanked for going too far in respectively testing copyright and privacy limits, and both firms likely merited it.


And both firms quickly retreated. The specifics here do not indicate a major inappropriate reaction, but the pattern is discomforting. For companies to lead the industry and stake out strong global positions--especially in a weak economy—requires bold action. That means being aggressive at times to see how far consumers and competitors will permit them to go.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read Amazon, Facebook: Retailers Want IT Leaders That Don’t Lead

  1. Bob LeMay Says:

    When you make the statement “Consumers are not that dumb (actually, they are, but let’s not go there)” you should use “we” instead of “they”.

    Unless you manage to live a self-sufficient lifestyle on a farm somewhere.

    Just because we might be on the business side of retail in our professional lives doesn’t free us from our roles as consumers, too.

  2. Rob Martell Says:

    That was a great article. I’m glad I read it.

    I’d heard about the Kindle thing with Amazon, and although I had heard about the Facebook issue, I don’t use it.

    Now that I have read this, I wish all consumers also had a bunch of lawyers at their disposal!

    Consumers aren’t necessarily dumb, they just can’t devote the time to decipher what the army of lawyers have concocted. And even that would assume they were properly informed about it.

    Argh!

  3. John Schulte Says:

    Facebook has other troubles too, if you’re thinking of using the site for creating business groups, which as I learned the hard way not to, or you should think twice about putting much time into.

    Since they cannot monitor all their members actions personally, your actions are monitored by technology, and it’s not perfect. You can easily do something that triggers their system to deactivate your profile, which in turn leaves any groups you started open to be taken over by the next person that visits the group.

    Yes, a competitor could take over your group.

    This is not well known among business people yet, but if facebook ever expects to be a serious player with business, their system needs to be fixed.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.