advertisement
advertisement


Amazon Learns The Downside To Empowering Employees

Written by Evan Schuman
April 14th, 2009
This seems to be the week for large retailers to appreciate—and fear—the power of the employee and to know when to limit it. Domino's Pizza learned that lesson when two employees decided to do a little Web video and social networking on their own and Amazon learned it when a slice of its public database was rewritten courtesy of a one-keystroke error from one employee in France.

How was it that one employee was able to make that change and have it populate globally? No supervisor had to approve? No software to check for a radical shift of titles? Not even a pair of employees checking each other's work?

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read Amazon Learns The Downside To Empowering Employees

  1. Lee Says:

    The more things change, the more they remain the same. I am reminded of the adage: “for want of a nail, the kingdom was lost” (For those that have not heard that expression, it dates back to the day when communications depended on horse and rider, and horses depended on shoes,which needed nails)

  2. Rick Boretsky Says:

    I think in both cases, although not the same, that these displays of lunacy or error are getting blown out of proportion. In fact, I think because of today’s technology and internet-crazed world, stories like this can get disclosed quickly and virally, so that companies like Dominos can deal with it immediately. Only because of youtube could this have been so widely viewed and dealt with. Dominos did what they had to do – fire the boneheads!! Dominos did make a youtube apology, but personally I don’t even think that was really necessary. In my mind this unique case is not a reflection of the company, but simply a couple of yahoos making a stupid video and probably not even smart enough to realize it was going to cost them their jobs. Dominos fired them, done! Move on.

  3. James Loar Says:

    The idea that there would be a ‘supervisor approval’ or ‘second employee to check the other’s work’ is in complete violation of the LEAN business philosophies. Companies are downsizing — there are no extra employees anymore to check each other’s work. Those days are long gone. As for incorporating new software rules, this is more likely — but how many of these scenarios are still waiting to be defined and written (by the fewer emplyees)? For now we only can expect, “Are you sure you want to change 50,000 records?” > Yes / No

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.