<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Learns The Downside To Empowering Employees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/amazon-learns-the-downside-to-empowering-employees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/amazon-learns-the-downside-to-empowering-employees/</link>
	<description>Techniques, Tools and Tirades about Retail Technology and E-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Loar</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/amazon-learns-the-downside-to-empowering-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-59632</link>
		<dc:creator>James Loar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/?p=2788#comment-59632</guid>
		<description>The idea that there would be a &#039;supervisor approval&#039; or &#039;second employee to check the other&#039;s work&#039; is in complete violation of the LEAN business philosophies.  Companies are downsizing -- there are no extra employees anymore to check each other&#039;s work.  Those days are long gone.  As for incorporating new software rules, this is more likely -- but how many of these scenarios are still waiting to be defined and written (by the fewer emplyees)?  For now we only can expect, &quot;Are you sure you want to change 50,000 records?&quot; &gt; Yes / No</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that there would be a &#8216;supervisor approval&#8217; or &#8216;second employee to check the other&#8217;s work&#8217; is in complete violation of the LEAN business philosophies.  Companies are downsizing &#8212; there are no extra employees anymore to check each other&#8217;s work.  Those days are long gone.  As for incorporating new software rules, this is more likely &#8212; but how many of these scenarios are still waiting to be defined and written (by the fewer emplyees)?  For now we only can expect, &#8220;Are you sure you want to change 50,000 records?&#8221; &gt; Yes / No</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boretsky</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/amazon-learns-the-downside-to-empowering-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-59404</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Boretsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/?p=2788#comment-59404</guid>
		<description>I think in both cases, although not the same, that these displays of lunacy or error are getting blown out of proportion. In fact, I think because of today&#039;s technology and internet-crazed world, stories like this can get disclosed quickly and virally, so that companies like Dominos can deal with it immediately. Only because of youtube could this have been so widely viewed and dealt with. Dominos did what they had to do - fire the boneheads!! Dominos did make a youtube apology, but personally I don&#039;t even think that was really necessary. In my mind this unique case is not a reflection of the company, but simply a couple of yahoos making a stupid video and probably not even smart enough to realize it was going to cost them their jobs. Dominos fired them, done! Move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in both cases, although not the same, that these displays of lunacy or error are getting blown out of proportion. In fact, I think because of today&#8217;s technology and internet-crazed world, stories like this can get disclosed quickly and virally, so that companies like Dominos can deal with it immediately. Only because of youtube could this have been so widely viewed and dealt with. Dominos did what they had to do &#8211; fire the boneheads!! Dominos did make a youtube apology, but personally I don&#8217;t even think that was really necessary. In my mind this unique case is not a reflection of the company, but simply a couple of yahoos making a stupid video and probably not even smart enough to realize it was going to cost them their jobs. Dominos fired them, done! Move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/amazon-learns-the-downside-to-empowering-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-59327</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/?p=2788#comment-59327</guid>
		<description>The more things change, the more they remain the same.  I am reminded of the adage: &quot;for want of a nail, the kingdom was lost&quot; (For those that have not heard that expression, it dates back to the day when communications depended on horse and rider, and horses depended on shoes,which needed nails)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more things change, the more they remain the same.  I am reminded of the adage: &#8220;for want of a nail, the kingdom was lost&#8221; (For those that have not heard that expression, it dates back to the day when communications depended on horse and rider, and horses depended on shoes,which needed nails)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

