advertisement
advertisement

Amazon Owns More Than A Third of U.S. E-Commerce, Report Says

Written by Fred J. Aun
April 16th, 2009

Everybody knows Amazon.com is an online giant. Now an analyst has determined just how big a giant: According to RBC Capital Analyst Stephen Ju, Amazon accounts for more than a third of all E-Commerce.

“Using our data, the total GMV (value of all the e-commerce activity flowing through AMZN’s platform) is close to $12.5 billion in the U.S., or 34 percent of the $37 billion the U.S. Commerce Department reported for 4Q08,” wrote Ju an April 14 report called “How Much Share Does Amazon Really Have?” Ju determined Amazon’s piece of the U.S. E-Commerce pie continues to grow. It was 27 percent last year, he wrote.


advertisement

5 Comments | Read Amazon Owns More Than A Third of U.S. E-Commerce, Report Says

  1. Gail Says:

    A day late and a dollar short. 4Q08 is long gone; what about 1Q09? How is AMZN doing now?

    How about adding some perspective? Compare AMZN’s marketshare to EBAY. Compare it to retail stores with online presence, such as Walmart. Simply stating statistics is an empty exercise.

  2. Carol Says:

    What is meant by platform? Is this Amazon sales or sales from every merchant who uses the Amazon storefront? Or is the dollar volume generated by other merchants in Amazon’s storefront small enough to be irrelevant?

  3. Questioning Says:

    It states AMZ’s platform which many other retailers use. I wonder what the state is for just AMZ’s website and not the overall platform.

  4. Amazon Says:

    The Amazon “platform” is more than just the store. Many “stores” use the cart functions from Amazon. They also have a “self publish” option. A company can build their own e-commerce store using the Amazon Platform.

  5. Wedge Says:

    Gail -

    I’d guess that Amazon smoked eBay. Amazon does a good job with its merchants to push products that sell, and offer competition on those products which means customers get a good price.

    eBay let’s everyone list everything, does nothing to help its sellers (raising fees, taking away the ability to leave feedback, etc.)

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.