Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Consumers Punishing Physical Stores For The Sins Of Their Online Counterparts
advertisement
advertisement

Consumers Punishing Physical Stores For The Sins Of Their Online Counterparts

Written by Evan Schuman
November 3rd, 2006
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Retailers have for years argued that their online and offline operations should be seen as one. A recent survey suggested that the persuasion was working and that some retailers may regret it.

The survey by Gomez, an internet performance tracking company, shows that many consumers who have a bad online experience are now avoiding the in-store experience from that same retailer. In some instances, that truly is a Catch-22 situation. Nordstrom, for example, has a reputation for delivering extremely personalized and attentive customer service for people visiting their stores. That high-touch attribute is quite difficult to replicate online, setting themselves up to disappoint online visitors. Those disappointed unhappy online visitors would then potentially punish the brick-and-mortar locations as well.

“Retailers have been very slow to understand that, to the consumer, it’s one brand,” said Paula Rosenblum, a retail technology analyst for the Retail Systems Alert Group. “They’re not structured for it. They’re not compensated correctly for it and, in many ways, their technology isn’t set up to accommodate that.” To read the full story, please click here.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Consumers Punishing Physical Stores For The Sins Of Their Online Counterparts

  1. e. casey Says:

    As a consumer, this is extremely frustrating. I found some items on line at Dicks Sporting Goods, but when I went to the store to try to buy them, I was told, ‘oh, another company just USES our name on line, we don’t carry all of the same products or even at all the same retails.’ They won’t be getting any of my business going forward.

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...