advertisement
advertisement

E-Tailers Dodge A FACTA Bullet

Written by Evan Schuman
February 11th, 2010

FACTA, the federal law that prohibits POS receipts from displaying full credit card numbers and expiration dates, does not apply to E-Commerce purchases, a federal judge has ruled. The fear had been that the electronic purchase receipts E-mailed to customers might have to comply with the same paper receipt truncation rules, but U.S. District Court Judge John W. Darrah (Northern District of Illinois) ruled that E-tailers are immune from the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA).

“E-mail order confirmations are not entitled to FACTA protection” because they “are not electronically printed receipts under FACTA,” Darrah said. “Second, an E-mail order confirmation is not provided at the point of sale or transaction under FACTA. Although plaintiff posits that print is commonly understood to mean ‘to display on a surface (as a computer screen) for viewing,’ this argument is unpersuasive.”


advertisement

2 Comments | Read E-Tailers Dodge A FACTA Bullet

  1. Steve Sommers Says:

    Well this is a blow to PCI and card security. Email receipts should fall under FACTA as it is a bigger security risk than printed receipts. Email is not secure. Everyone knows this. Except apparently, some ecommerce merchants and some judges.

    There are consumer privacy groups out there. If there is not already one started, some should start a campaign to blacklist offenders of FACTA — not legal offenders (apparently), but spirit of FACTA offenders — and boycott these sites until they fix it. Luckily, I think the number of sites that email full card numbers in the confirmation is probably low — I have never received one.

  2. Brian Says:

    While it may not apply under FACTA, PCI still applies. So if the merchant thinks s/he got a pass, just wait till their bank gives them a call after one of those plain-text receipts gets compromised.
    What a moron of a judge. S/he should be removed from any and all cases that include information technology. They clearly don’t get it.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.