<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In The M-Commerce Page Load World: Target, Sears Slow; Amazon, QVC Fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/in-the-m-commerce-page-load-world-target-sears-slow-amazon-qvc-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/in-the-m-commerce-page-load-world-target-sears-slow-amazon-qvc-fast/</link>
	<description>Techniques, Tools and Tirades about Retail Technology and E-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 01:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Taylor</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/in-the-m-commerce-page-load-world-target-sears-slow-amazon-qvc-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-64216</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/?p=4346#comment-64216</guid>
		<description>The Target vs. Amazon results are really interesting, seeing as how Amazon runs Target&#039;s site.  Looks like someone missed some clauses in the contract on performance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Target vs. Amazon results are really interesting, seeing as how Amazon runs Target&#8217;s site.  Looks like someone missed some clauses in the contract on performance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

