<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: J.C. Penney Says It Experienced &#8220;Some Order Issues&#8221; on Monday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/j-c-penney-says-it-experienced-some-order-issues-on-monday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/j-c-penney-says-it-experienced-some-order-issues-on-monday/</link>
	<description>Techniques, Tools and Tirades about Retail Technology and E-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/j-c-penney-says-it-experienced-some-order-issues-on-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-64205</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/?p=4357#comment-64205</guid>
		<description>There is a rule for criticizing that says if you don&#039;t like how or what one is doing, you must recommend a better alternative.  It&#039;s not always about bandwidth that was insufficient,  the complexities of running a website are much more diverse than that.  Volume sometimes brings to light - coding issues,  caching issues with popular content,3rd party site partners like tax computation providers, or credit card authorization providers, etc.  I&#039;m sure the community could weigh in with many more.  It&#039;s just not as simple as bandwidth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a rule for criticizing that says if you don&#8217;t like how or what one is doing, you must recommend a better alternative.  It&#8217;s not always about bandwidth that was insufficient,  the complexities of running a website are much more diverse than that.  Volume sometimes brings to light &#8211; coding issues,  caching issues with popular content,3rd party site partners like tax computation providers, or credit card authorization providers, etc.  I&#8217;m sure the community could weigh in with many more.  It&#8217;s just not as simple as bandwidth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

