advertisement
advertisement


Merged Channel Is Good, But Keep IT Units Channel-Centric

Written by Evan Schuman
September 25th, 2008
Merged channel is all the rage—as it should be—but one key analyst is arguing that retailers must merge their channels, not their IT groups.

The problem is that most IT functions in-store are behind-the-scenes. To put a finer point on it, argues Nikki Baird of Retail Systems Research, is that in-store IT is not usually creating things that are customer-facing. This matters because retailers like to prioritize IT projects based on traditional ROI spreadsheet metrics, which rarely apply to new ideas for customer interactions.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Merged Channel Is Good, But Keep IT Units Channel-Centric

  1. Ken Says:

    It is matter of company culture and business philosophy. Where in the organization does the corporate CIO report– to the CFO, to the COO, to the CEO? Does the company senior management team make business decisions based on strategic parameters and metrics/targets tied to those parameters/objectives or does it run based primarily on “gut instinct” (i.e. I’ve been in this business 25 years and I anecdotely know what works). Will the head of this IT group within the channel be part of the leadership team of the team running the channel?

    In general, the skill set of the IT team working on a behind-the-scenes technology vs. customer-facing technology is different, however, there are definitely business philosophies as to why you want to have a centralized IT– such as consistent architecture, purchasing power, and the like. Having separately run IT organizations only opens the company up to having a higher cost structure than what is warranted.

    But then again- if the eCommerce channel is kickin’ butt and the other channels are lagging– then they would probably be able to afford to have a separate IT…..

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.