advertisement
advertisement

Pier 1 Abandoning E-Commerce

Written by Evan Schuman
June 22nd, 2007

background-image: url(“/images/copy/Pier1.jpg”); background-repeat: no-repeat’>

In an against-the-trend move, Pier 1 will shut down all of its online operations, focusing solely on select physical locations.

“We are exiting all non-Pier 1 stores activities,” Pier 1 president and CEO Alex W. Smith told Wall Street analysts on the company’s first-quarter conference call, according to an Internet Retailer story. “We are exiting the e-commerce and catalog business.”

The move may not be permanent, however, according to a report from Marketwatch, which quoted Smith as saying that pier1.com will continue, but purely for marketing. “We’re not saying this is forever,” Smith said. “We’re just saying this is where we need to be today.”

Although the trend is a push toward a unified merged channel–combining online and offline–when having to choose one over the other, online is typically seen as being less costly to operate. The other major retail chain to have similarly pulled back has been TJX, which pulled back from its E-Commerce efforts for T.J. Maxx and HomeGoods in late 2005. But there’s a connection: Alex Smith had been a Senior VP at TJX when TJX pulled back from E-Commerce and this is the same Smith who today runs Pier 1.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read Pier 1 Abandoning E-Commerce

  1. Richard Jones Says:

    My money is on this being a permanent move, and not for the reasons one might suspect. Pier 1, like TJX, has a business model that relies heavily on opportunity buying. This is fundamentally at odds with the merchandising, planning and backend operations required to run a profitable e-commerce division. Even if they were financially healthy, Pier 1 probably has no good business (literally) selling online.

    This idea is more deeply explored at: http://blog.productblazer.com/2007/06/29/when-backward-is-forward/

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    Richard makes an excellent point, namely that it doesn’t make sense for every brick-and-mortar retailer to sell via E-Commerce any more than it’s necessary for every E-Commerce site to invest in a physical storefront. The ProductBlazer link he referenced eloquently gives some good business model examples where online fails the logic test.
    But …. you knew there was an imminent but, no? …. it’s the particulars in this case that makes the argument. For the majority of retailers, it truly does make sense to support as many channels as possible (in-store, Web, mobile, call center, catalogue, etc.) and to integrate them as seamlessly as possible.
    It’s also important to distinguish selling via E-Commerce (which may not make sense for every retailer) from having a Web presence. Even if it’s just a jazzed-up brochure site, I can’t thing of a reason why a retailer wouldn’t want to have resources dedicated to maintaining an effective Web presence.

  3. Megan Says:

    I can’t think of a bigger mistake for Pier 1. In an age where everyone is turning to the internet, Pier 1 is taking a step backwards. “Against the trend” is putting it mildly. I believe it’s pure madness.

    With internet shopping, they would have had access to customers anywhere in the country, by contrast, they don’t have stores in every city. Stores close – internet is 24/7. You can certainly browse an online store and impulse buy, but you don’t have to get dressed or drive to a store, to do it. It’s instant gratification, if the store is done properly.

    If Pier 1 didn’t see enough activity on their website, it was because most items were unavailable, and customers grew frustrated. I count myself among them. Because Pier 1 was probably shipping from their store inventory, or very select warehouses, they weren’t taking advantage of the wider demographics their stores couldn’t reach. Availibility of items was checked by zipcode, and 9 times out of 10 they were out of stock in your area.

    Additionally, no coupons or gift certificates could be used on the site. A huge mistake, as it’s a great way for a customer to make up for paying shipping fees. Instead, they blocked customers at every turn, and made shopping online difficult.

    Pier 1, no matter where you sell, you’re either all the way in or you’re out. I don’t think you understood internet shopping to begin with. Your competitors, like Pottery Barn, Crate & Barrel, etc., thrive online because they understand how valuable it is. Maybe it’s best that you’re out until you can truly commit to a web presence, and all the opportunities it brings. I’d be glad to show you how.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.