advertisement
advertisement


This is page 2 of:

Wait A Minute, Akamai, With Your 2-Second Page Load Report

September 23rd, 2009
Akamai recently published a study saying consumers lose patience with E-Commerce sites that take more than two seconds to load. The September 14 report, based on an Akamai-commissioned survey by Forrester, received a good deal of media attention. But the conclusion—that sites that used to have to load in four seconds now need to load twice as quickly—is not only not supported in the report itself, but it doesn't make any sense given the complicated reality that is today's Web.

Nobody will argue that when it comes to page display rates, the faster the better. However, we couldn't help but wonder about the accuracy, and meaningfulness, of the report. Did anybody actually measure how many seconds passed before an E-Commerce consumer clicked away from a retailer site? It seems hard to believe that somebody interested in shopping at, say, Macys.com would flee in a huff to Kohls.com if the Macy's site didn't load before three seconds had passed.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Wait A Minute, Akamai, With Your 2-Second Page Load Report

  1. JamesSimon Says:

    If we could get to the stage where sites load in 4 seconds, let alone, 2 seconds that would be awesome achievement. The most import message from their message is that page load speed is important – and really important for ecommerce sites – people won’t wait to give you money – right?

    About 2 years and some customer feedback from visitors that my websites were slow – I launched into finding out why, i’m not a techie but I know I hate slow websites. I was shocked to discover that in countries where I do the most business (US, UK, AUS) my sites were taking waaaay longer to download, memorably 34 seconds in the UK. The interesting learning for me was that while my site loads fast for me, it loaded at different rates all around the world dependent on the distance form the customers browser to the server where my website/s was hosted (factor called ‘latency’).

    What I did: got in the ‘expert’, cost me a lot but made a big difference to my page load speed – my ‘expert’ moved jobs and I went looking for a solution that I could turn on and would automate making my websites faster and, you know, there was very little out there (though things may have changed I did this piece of work over 12 months ago). I decided on the website accelerator from Aptimize and it does everything for me.

    The result: i now get feedback from other people asking me how my sites, with all their images, load so fast – traffic up by 15%, page views up by 31%, newletter sign-up 17%, sales up 9%.

    Don’t assume everyone (your potential customers) is experiencing the same page load speed as you – because they are not.

  2. Rob Martell Says:

    As a consumer, I am stunned by the number of servers that must respond to my request to view a vendor’s website. When any one of them slows everything or even stops it (Waiting for …) I definitely move on.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...
The ETA recently launched the Certified Payment Professional program, which charges $425 for non-members to take the test, assuming they meet the 'experience' requirement, to PROVE they are a professional. And they'll have to take it every 3 years. Worthy program, but high cost. Plus, only a select few were allowed to be in the first class, and there are only 4 test windows per year currently. So being on the registry simply means, you were lucky enough to get picked, nothing to do with skill level. Read more...
@Cory: Thanks for your comment and question about the pricing of the QIR training. I raised that question in a conversation with Bob Russo last week, and I will address it in a follow-up column in a few days. While the pricing is not yet set, hopefully it will not be too great a burden for you or other integrators/resellers. We'll have to see, though. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.