advertisement
advertisement


With Online Ordering, Your Cashiers Can No Longer Cover For You

Written by Todd L. Michaud
March 4th, 2010
Many restaurant chains don’t realize that by implementing online ordering, they are exposing their menu system to consumers for the first time. This may not seem like a big deal. But in all the concepts that Franchisee Columnist Todd Michaud has worked on over the years, the actual menu architecture has been both very flawed and typically “covered up” by the restaurant’s crew, who knows how to work around its challenges. For example, he talks about a group of restaurants that used the “No – Add Ketchup” modifier for about 3 years. The crew understood this to mean “No Ketchup.” A customer, meanwhile, would look at the receipt and say, “But I don’t want any ketchup!”

Such a system obviously can’t be unleashed on the Internet. Consumers will not tolerate a system that is difficult to use. For chains, the challenges often come from tracking data in one way while marketing/selling it in another. Add to that the complexity of each franchisee having unique, local store marketing offers and the responsibility for its own pricing, and what seems very simple can quickly become very complex.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read With Online Ordering, Your Cashiers Can No Longer Cover For You

  1. Dan Veronese Says:

    Todd,

    Thank you for the post. You make some excellent points to be sure. It’s great to see some dialogue about the operational aspects of online ordering.

    The obvious benefits of adding online ordering to a restaurant’s site is to open the “doors” for business so to speak. That said, there are some ins and outs that are important with regard to the operations and efficiency of not only the ordering, but fulfillment and efficiency of the program.

    You’re right regarding the modifiers as well and POS integration. While a POS is designed for a tactile response, the online ordering site must be intuitive and guide the guest through the various modifiers and up sell opportunities and many times the “lingo” from the internal operations won’t work for the guests. Such as “heavy” for condiments or “four-top”, etc.

    It’s important that any provider work with their clients to insure the guest experience is as close to the in-store experience as possible, so descriptions of all menu items are clear and simple-and can be executed properly during the fulfillment. We sometimes recommend that clients begin with a simple to-go menu which may help the guests as they begin using online ordering and simplify the process. We can always continue to add and build the menu of course.

    With POS integration, we have performed many of these-over 10 complete integrations-and while we pull the menu from the POS, the descriptions are not going to be as enticing-IE: “brown sauce” in the POS would maybe be “savory homemade beef sauce” or something like that. As for 86′ing an item, we have a specific tool on the BOH that is live and a manager can click into to manage out of stock items, increase prep/delivery times and even turn off OLO if they become too busy to accept orders. We’ve found this tool very effective because the managers do not have to actually go into the admin site or log in to make these types of changes.

    It’s critical that any online provider understands the nuances of the various menus and process in order to help build check averages. (I’m not sure about 70% though to be honest.) One item that is very important-for everyone’s sake-is that any integration has a consistent and simple structure from which to build the integration. While we build each store individually to allow for different tax rates or items, without a “core” menu, the integration and menu management can become very hard to maintain or manage.

    That said, when changes are made to the menu in the POS, a real integration will make the changes on the site as well during the next sync, so there shouldn’t be a need to make the changes more than once. This should be allowed at either a local, regional or global level as well. The only time I suggest someone get in there (and we offer the ability to do this either in house or via our operations team) is when a new menu item is added. Then the descriptions will be accurate and enticing.

    Thanks again for the column and discussion. I’m very happy to see more and more people talking about the value and efficiency of a real online ordering program from an experienced provider from just putting food online or “lipstick on a pig!” Dan

  2. Noah Glass Says:

    There are a lot of online ordering salesmen out there who promise full POS-integration, when all they really execute is one-way order transmission to the POS. True integration should be a two-way street, including both order transmission and menu extraction. Menu extraction means that your online menu is updated in real-time when an item is 86’d or turned back on. Dan gets it absolutely right on when your online menu needs the human touch. No customer wants to see “BRGR” when they are perusing your online menu. They want the proper name for the product, the same description they get on the paper menu, and maybe even an image. Once that “consumer layer” is put on top, you have translated POS-speak into consumer-speak.

    There is no doubt that this level of POS-integration is the “ultimate solution.” There is no doubt that all online ordering service providers should strive to make this “ultimate solution” a reality for each restaurant chain. Still, what about those pesky legacy POS platforms you mention? I have yet to meet a national restaurant chain with all of its stores on the same POS platform and version. The “ultimate solution” is not the only solution. As Voltaire said, “The perfect is the enemy of the good.” Many restaurant chains hesitate to implement online ordering because of the “yet another menu to update” philosophy. Still, one cannot ignore the fact that online ordering now accounts for over 20% of sales for several national restaurant chains. I would argue that the cost of waiting to implement online ordering most likely outweighs the cost of updating one more menu per marketing window.

    One approach could be to use a new, POS-independent device to receive and accept online orders. A cell phone-sized mobile device could bolt onto the cash register or countertop, and ring, buzz, and flash when a new order arrived, without requiring a separate phone line or Internet connection. This approach could just meet the needs of those restaurant executives who want to increase takeout sales by implementing online ordering now, not when pigs fly (lipstick or no lipstick).

    Noah

    Noah Glass is the Chief Executive Officer of GoMobo Online Ordering

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.