<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Handheld RFID Reader Claiming 25-Foot Read Range, 400 Tags/Sec. Read Rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/mobile-wireless-contactless/handheld-rfid-reader-claiming-25-feet-read-range-400-tagssec-read-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/mobile-wireless-contactless/handheld-rfid-reader-claiming-25-feet-read-range-400-tagssec-read-rate/</link>
	<description>Techniques, Tools and Tirades about Retail Technology and E-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Reader</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/mobile-wireless-contactless/handheld-rfid-reader-claiming-25-feet-read-range-400-tagssec-read-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-49348</link>
		<dc:creator>A Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/contactlesswireless/handheld-rfid-reader-claiming-25-feet-read-range-400-tagssec-read-rate/#comment-49348</guid>
		<description>The difference between RFID credit cards and these RFID tags is in the frequency of the two systems and the physics of radio wave propagation at those different frequencies.

RFID tags are available in several frequencies.  The ones read by the equipment in this article are based on UHF.  Hackers have already demonstrated homebrew equipment that can read UHF RFID tags from 69 feet.  

Most credit cards are based on ISO-14443, which uses a much longer wavelength than UHF tags and typically claims a maximum read distance of a few inches.  Hackers have demonstrated low-cost reading equipment with a range of about a foot.

The gear in this article is newsworthy for its impressive read-rate performance at these distances, and not just for its long distance reach.  Something like this could work well covering an entire loading dock, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between RFID credit cards and these RFID tags is in the frequency of the two systems and the physics of radio wave propagation at those different frequencies.</p>
<p>RFID tags are available in several frequencies.  The ones read by the equipment in this article are based on UHF.  Hackers have already demonstrated homebrew equipment that can read UHF RFID tags from 69 feet.  </p>
<p>Most credit cards are based on ISO-14443, which uses a much longer wavelength than UHF tags and typically claims a maximum read distance of a few inches.  Hackers have demonstrated low-cost reading equipment with a range of about a foot.</p>
<p>The gear in this article is newsworthy for its impressive read-rate performance at these distances, and not just for its long distance reach.  Something like this could work well covering an entire loading dock, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/mobile-wireless-contactless/handheld-rfid-reader-claiming-25-feet-read-range-400-tagssec-read-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-49287</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/contactlesswireless/handheld-rfid-reader-claiming-25-feet-read-range-400-tagssec-read-rate/#comment-49287</guid>
		<description>What prevents a hacker from buying and reading RFID credit cards from further away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What prevents a hacker from buying and reading RFID credit cards from further away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

