Android Is About To Truly Kill The POS Business Model
Written by Todd L. MichaudJanuary 13th, 2012
This year—2012—will be the beginning of the end for the traditional POS platform. Even though many analysts predicted that Apple, and its iPad, would be the David that finally took down the Goliaths, Retail Columnist Todd Michaud is arguing that Google will land the fatal blow.
The POS defense has been that chains need hardened systems. That argument worked when tablets were $500 and even $400. But now that Android tablets have fallen below $100, the argument falls apart. You could have four spares in the backroom and still be ahead.
This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.
Already a Subscriber? Login Here
Pages: 1 2
3 Comments | Read Android Is About To Truly Kill The POS Business Model
Leave a Reply
Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.
-Thad Peterson
January 18th, 2012 at 11:22 am
I agree that with tablets specifically becoming cheaper, they do offer a form factor that can be used in the retail environment. But, I still see the adoption happening slowly before it becomes ubiquitous.
January 19th, 2012 at 1:10 pm
Classic sides squaring off here: existing POS providers want buyers to believe tablet-based POS is discontinuous innovation with whole product risk – where to get service if not from one vendor, industrial grade?, theft, etc. Tablet suppliers will dis-intermediate the incombants by positioning their innovation as re-segmenting the existing POS experience with continuous innovation for forward-thinking retailers. Here is my thesis.
Why limit POS to front of store where we only do mind-numbing checkout. That was yesterday’s need for yesterday’s problem – expensive POS that had to be fixed to the floor.
I would position the tablet enabled buying experience as solving a much more valuable retail problem… 1:1 service at scale with increasing cart size and margin per customer. “Our tablet based enabler allows your professional customer service personnel to meet the client in the aisles, help them with style, fit, selection, accessories and use rich media to explain the premium price value. Our version 2 moves from transaction enablement to relationship mgmt whereby customers prior purchase history is available to accessorize and extend with each visit, no matter which tablet toting retail assistant they greet.”
I have seen one great example already of this discontinuous innovation: Chair lift boarding in Utah ski resorts! Smart tickets are sensed at the turnstyle and lift attendants in snow and cold alternate holding the iPad. Season ticket holders, instructors and out of town guest pictures are displayed to the attendant who can:
1) recognize a large picture and eliminate season pass fraud
2) get warnings when fast skiers return to queue too fast and can suggest more challenging terrain where slower skiers are at less risk
2) greet out of towners and offer lunch reservations with discounts onto their day pass.
Its not about how the tablet does the existing mind-numbing checkout cheaper. Its about how the iPad allows higher end retail and mass retail to sell more premiums, increase avg sale, move excess inventory, and change a trx to a relationship. Big box competes on price and must rely on volume inlane checkout at minimum wage. Tablet enabled experience is for everyone else. I see the future world where you will endure the big box for commodity purchase at lowest cost. For considered purchases, we will favor friendly, more personal experience at retailers who know your persona, sell with deeper product content/comparison, and check out in aisle much like Hertz and Avis do today.
If your readers or retailers want to discuss enable the vision with new positioning, please call or write:
chris@couloir.net or 650-868-7440.
chris roon
January 19th, 2012 at 11:21 pm
I see the flight of smaller service and food vendors to tablet based checkout happening right now in the burgeoning Hayes Valley shopping district.
However, to completely displace the traditional POS *software*, payment acceptance is only part of the requirement.
What is holding back the rest of us is the lack of a viable software solution for inventory-driven businesses. Square just doesn’t cut it, at least the last time I looked at its capabilities. Inventory management and reporting, purchasing and invoicing, as well as multiple location and channel capabilities are some the features that force us to the much maligned legacy POS solutions.
There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground between the entrenched, large scale POS solutions and the agile ‘startup merchant’ apps that run on tablets or iphones.
Furthermore, as demonstrated by the recent Carrier IQ scandal, there are real security and transparency concerns around the use of cutting-edge products like the iPad. Once these wifi,bluetooth and cell-enabled devices become ubiquitous as a payments platform, I think we’ll see some consequences of having their much larger attack surface. So much more to hack than that old wired POS!
But to steer back to the original subject, I agree that the fossilized, register-centric POS will be inevitably much of their market share to the new breed of retail-enabling hardware, but find that in my personal experience its the software, not the hardware that is limiting the progress.
cheers,
david