Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Is Wal-Mart Canada’s New RFID Strategy A Hint Of A Gentler Wal-Mart CIO?
advertisement
advertisement

Is Wal-Mart Canada’s New RFID Strategy A Hint Of A Gentler Wal-Mart CIO?

Written by Evan Schuman
July 11th, 2006
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Wal-Mart Canada’s new RFID program will be entirely voluntary, which is the latest tealeaf suggesting that the chain’s new CIO is adopting a gentler tone.

This is all going on with the background that Wal-Mart is still quietly struggling with its RFID efforts. “Wal-Mart is having significant problems. There are problems inside of Wal-Mart,” such as distribution centers that “can’t handle” Gen2 communications, one observer said. “They’re looking to replace those readers. They can’t comply with the latest standards.” To read the full story, please click here.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Is Wal-Mart Canada’s New RFID Strategy A Hint Of A Gentler Wal-Mart CIO?

  1. Chris Kapsambelis Says:

    The initial RFID pilots are a failure. RFID Portals do not work and are being abandoned in favor of RFID Fork Lifts which will perform even worse. Smart Shelves don’t work and are being abandoned for heavy Hand-Held RFID Readers. Wal-Mart is going to have to retool before it can proceed. Look for this Canadian effort to stall and then fade away.

    Then, there is the wacky idea of RFID clad Wal-Mart associates running through a chaotic back room searching for items in demand. What happened to the expectation that RFID was capable of precisely tracking everything in the world automatically? Now we are being told that RFID can find everything that has ever been lost manually. Wow!

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...