advertisement
advertisement


Rewriting Cost-per-Use, Staples Trials Reusable RFID Tags

Written by Evan Schuman
June 8th, 2007

Traditional arguments against item-level RFID use is that it only makes economic sense for products costing more than $100. But that assumes one-time use. With a trial with re-usable tags, Staples is throwing out all the old rules.

Staples in Canada started its trial this month at one of its Montreal stores, selectively tagging about 2,000 items representing some 300 SKUs out of the 7,500 SKUs in a typical location, said Joe Soares, director of process engineering for Staples and Business Depot. The tags themselves are higher-end active tags, which would typically cost Staples between $5 and $8 each. For the six-week trial, though, Soares said, "it's not costing us anything" because the costs are being picked up by partners, including Fujitsu and AbsoluteSky.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read Rewriting Cost-per-Use, Staples Trials Reusable RFID Tags

  1. David Cox Says:

    I think that it is not a bad idea but as far as product return fraud. At the RFID item level tagging process, when a customer returns a product it can be identifed to know whether it was actually purchased or not by reading the information written into the tag at the point of sale. When a customer returns the product at the service counter a reader will be able to read the tag to make for it is a good return.

  2. Bob Amster Says:

    It is not suprising that Staples is trying the Item-level use of RFID. The true benefit of RFID tagging is at the item level, much more so than at the supply chain level.

    The reason that most pilots started at the supply chain level is simple. It has been cheaper to enter into such a pilot.

    The additional concept of appying re-usable active tags is a further display of creativity that will no doubt result in validating our continuing belief that item-level RFID tagging will succeed and “will deliver the goods.”

    The industry needs creative, bold thinkers–IT leaders with balls–to act in order to reap the benefits of what i think is a highly promising technology.

  3. Chris Kapsambelis Says:

    The main reason retailers have trouble maintaining accurate inventory with bar codes is the lack of discipline needed to scan the item as it moves through the system. Most retailers have not gone beyond doing price lookup at POS with bar codes at the item level.

    The Staples scheme is based on tagging items as they enter the system, entering the data into a new server, and maintaining the flow automatically. Aside from the additional cost, it is hard to believe that retailers can enforce the needed discipline in tagging, and data entry when they are not able to enforce the needed discipline in reading bar codes.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.