Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Tesco’s UHF RFID Troubles
advertisement
advertisement

Tesco’s UHF RFID Troubles

Written by Evan Schuman
July 12th, 2006
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Being one of the world’s leading advocates for RFID hasn’t shielded Tesco—nor Wal-Mart, for that matter—from feeling RFID’s growing pains.

While Tesco has been playing the typical chicken-and-egg game with suppliers on who will initially fund tagging all products, it’s had to quietly cut back its RFID efforts as it is trying to work with European UHF regulations, said Raghu Das, CEO of European RFID consulting firm IDTechEx.

Tesco has been enjoying a strong four percent revenue boost from RFID-enabled inventory improvements, but it’s been applying the tags by hand, which is not a tactic that can be continued indefinitely. Tesco, which ordered 2,000 RFID readers just two years ago, is in the RFID game for the longterm and is begging suppliers to take a more aggressive position. To read the full story, please click here.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Tesco’s UHF RFID Troubles

  1. Richard Lucas Says:

    This analysis by Evan is accurate.

    RF ID is great for high value multiple use applications where there is a problem with bar code.
    Bar code is good enough for most applications, and much much cheaper.

    Bar code just requires almost free ink on paper, 2D barcodes like Aztec Datamatrix PDF417 or Qcode have vast datastorage capabilites, bar code scanners are cheap (and every web cam and camera phone has that capability).

    New technologies should be cheaper and better than the existing solution. RF ID is too big a cost hike to replace bar code. Most organisations have yet to exploit bar code fully.

    Also RFID technology is not stable. Who is going to invest billions in RF ID scanners that may not be the right ones for 3 years down the line?

    If I am wrong and RFID takes off, vendors of technology will take a lot of money off retailers and their suppliers. Those cost increases will pass through to consumers.

    Richard Lucas
    http://www.pmrcorporate.com

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...