Apple’s Geolocation Threat: Defining “Beneficial,” Apple Style
Written by Evan SchumanFebruary 11th, 2010
Apple this month posted a stern-sounding warning on its developer pages: make sure your geolocation efforts are designed with the user—and not an advertiser—in mind. "If you build your application with features based on a user's location, make sure these features provide beneficial information. If your app uses location-based information primarily to enable mobile advertisers to deliver targeted ads based on a user's location, your app will be returned to you by the App Store Review Team for modification before it can be posted to the App Store."
At a glance, that sounds like a fine consumer-oriented focus, but let's delve a bit deeper. Apple is by no means coming out against geolocation. The problem is how Cupertino is defining both the good ("provide beneficial information") and the bad ("deliver targeted ads"). Who's to say that a cleverly targeted ad doesn't, in fact, potentially provide beneficial information?
This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.
Already a Subscriber? Login Here
Leave a Reply
Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.
Is there really an improvement between a mag swipe and contactless tap if multi-factor authentication is required?
-Ed
