advertisement
advertisement

Avaya Learns An Expensive IT Lesson About Transitioning HR Systems

Written by Evan Schuman
October 29th, 2009

Back in the fall of 2002, $5.3 billion software firm Avaya purchased a brand new human resources database and payroll system. At the same time, it hired a new senior systems analyst. That analyst quickly reconsidered his decision and withdrew his acceptance of the position. Due to a problem with the database transition, the HR database removed him but the payroll system—with its new integrated direct deposit system—didn’t. Yep, payroll kept depositing checks into his account for years, giving the non-employee almost a half-million dollars.

New Jersey prosecutors have charged the almost-employee, Anthony Armatys, with theft, and he faces as many as six years in prison. Given that the checks kept getting deposited for more than four years (from October 2002 through February 2007) makes one wonder how long they would have continued had the systems analyst, according to the prosecutors, not chosen to push his luck. The Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office said that Armatys called Fidelity Investments, said he was an employee of Avaya and asked to transfer funds from his retirement savings account to his personal account. The irony is Avaya’s tagline: “Avaya delivers Intelligent Communications solutions that help companies transform their businesses to achieve marketplace advantage.” Wonder if that always includes payroll systems that don’t stop paying employees when HR deletes them or if that’s just a homegrown extra?


advertisement

One Comment | Read Avaya Learns An Expensive IT Lesson About Transitioning HR Systems

  1. Sreekumar J Says:

    This is a shocking incident. To be frank, unbelievable! but sometimes truth would be like that.

    One should be very careful when select a HR or Payroll software products. Also utmost care should be given for implementation and go live. IT team should perform periodic audits to find any discrepancies in system.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.