Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Best Buy Learns That Data Protection Can Be A Customer Issue
advertisement
advertisement

Best Buy Learns That Data Protection Can Be A Customer Issue

Written by Evan Schuman
June 15th, 2006
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

When a Cincinnati man brought his hard-drive to Best Buy to be repaired, he was told that he couldn’t have his old hard-drive back. But fear not, he was told: the drive would be made useless by having holes drilled in it.

A few months later, the fully intact drive is purchased at a flea market in Chicago for $25. This story isn’t apocryphal. The hard-drive owner’s name is Hank Gerbus and the story was first reported by a Cincinnati TV station.

The lesson for retailers is that data security is not merely an internal issue to be dealt with by IT. It needs to be dealt with seriously if customers are going to trust that retailer.

Security issues today are getting more difficult to deal with, as the bad guys get more clever. Almost all of the shredders being used by small businesses and consumers turn out pieces of paper that can easily be re-assembled. Here’s a great lab test from Popular Mechanics where they showed how easily shredder output can be de-Humpty-Dumptied.

But the biggest fear is how to deal with data-intensive CDs, DVDs and hard-disks. Some of the same shredders that fare so poorly with regular paper also slash away at CDs and DVDs. Surely that will prevent them from being read? According to one security expert, it depends on how badly you want that data.

Roger Hutchison is president of Digital Data Destruction Inc. and he argues that few IT execs “realize the ease with which media can be put back together. Very imminently, someone is going to publish the recipe for an electronic data dumpster diver.”

The methods Hutchison says crooks may use sounds a bit complicated, but he argues that as technology improves over the next year or so, the reconstruction efforts will get a lot easier. Today, though, the technique involves photographing the CD or DVD with an optical microscope and “then you calculate the zeros and ones and you look it up. You photograph and then run it through a filter to decode the binary information,” he said.

“It takes about $10,000 for a computer pirate to put together the entire suite of tools,” Hutchison said. “A 14-year-old in Taiwan with the equipment can easily do it.”

The methodology that Hutchison prefers involves grinding the information layer “smaller than the retrievable alphanumeric size, which is about 250 microns.”


advertisement

One Comment | Read Best Buy Learns That Data Protection Can Be A Customer Issue

  1. Stephen Gerard Says:

    Seems biased, since we work in this field, but we have seen the evidence to support this. Scary stuff. An officer at DHS coined the term Digital Pearl Harbor. While this was in a different context, it seem to be an accurate description of what might occur if an adversary of the US used this technique to attack, say, the US banking system. Who’s in charge of this security matter and how do we get the word out?

Leave a Reply

Newsletter

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Kill All The Passwords

This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...