advertisement
advertisement


Contactless Cards Proving To Be More Paymentless Than Contactless

Written by Evan Schuman
February 22nd, 2008
Contactless cards—which have been pushing accelerated checkout as both a consumer and retail benefit—are running into isolated problems with both. I've been trying to disprove these concerns and have been failing miserably.

Taking some cabs in New York City this month, I was thrilled to see the contactless devices in the backseat, only to be told by three different cabbies to not use them because customers were complaining about getting double-billed. This week, visiting three different grocery chains in New Jersey, tried unsuccessfully to use my contactless card there. The first time, a cashier looked at me as I asked about using my contactless card.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Contactless Cards Proving To Be More Paymentless Than Contactless

  1. CybAlert Says:

    I live in New York. In 30 years I don’t believe I’ve ever been in the same taxi cab, no less seen the same taxi cab driver twice.

    How would three cabbies know their customers were double billed ? Credit card processors do not go to the terminal operator when there is a duplicate charge with the same timestamp and reference number.

    I believe you’re taking a story that is circulating because cabbies do not want to accept credit cards of any type. Cabbies want good old American cash and they don’t want to pay credit card fees. Has nothing to do with contactless. But the City is ‘requiring’ cabs to accept credit cards and have GPS installed.

    AS to issuance of contactless cards, you’re absolutely correct.

    If I’ve received a contactless card from Chase, CitiBank, Discover, Bank of America or Amex none of them bothered to tell me the card is contactless.

    How does a consumer validate a card is contactless without looking like a fool at CVS ?

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    Editor’s Note: Thanks for the comment. As for the cabbie, you’re right that the processors wouldn’t go back to the cab company, but the consumer–seeing it–would likely call the cab company, so it seems plausible.
    As the piece noted, it sounded as though it might have been cabbies discouraging contactless, but they all suggested using the card outright. If the cabbies wanted to discourage credit cards, they didn’t try.
    As for the card identification, the cards should have a wireless icon on them, but it blends in, looking like just another logo.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.