Quantcast StorefrontBacktalk » Blog Archive » Dave & Buster’s Gets 20 Years In Gonzales Settlement
advertisement
advertisement

Dave & Buster’s Gets 20 Years In Gonzales Settlement

Written by Frank Hayes
June 24th, 2010
Like this story? Share it
To share this story with people in your social network, please click on the network icons below.

Dave & Buster’s will spend the next 20 years under the watchful eye of the FTC, according to a consent agreement finalized this month. The Federal Trade Commission accused the entertainment restaurant chain of failing to protect the credit and debit card numbers of 130,000 customers after Albert Gonzalez and his associates hacked into the company’s networks and stole their card numbers.

The FTC’s probe found that D&B “engaged in a number of practices that, taken together, failed to provide reasonable and appropriate security for personal information on its computer networks.”

Specifically, the FTC concluded that Dave & Buster’s failed to:

  • “Employ sufficient measures to detect and prevent unauthorized access to computer networks or to conduct security investigations, such as by employing an intrusion detection system and monitoring system logs.”
  • “Adequately restrict third-party access to its networks, such as by restricting connections to specific IP addresses or granting temporary, limited access.”
  • “Monitor and filter outbound traffic from its networks to identify and block export of sensitive personal information without authorization.”
  • Use “readily available security measures to limit access between in-store networks, such as by using firewalls or isolating the payment card system from the rest of the corporate network.”
  • Use “readily available security measures to limit access to its computer networks through wireless access points on the networks.”


    Interestingly enough, different sets of federal employees (FTC investigators, Justice Department and U.S. Attorney prosecutors, and three different federal judges) looking at this case from very different vantage points all arrived at roughly the same figure: 20 years. Gonzalez was sentenced to 20 years and a day by the federal judges, while Dave & Buster’s has been ordered to spend the next 20 years, until May 2030, making compliance reports back to the FTC.

    How circular: The feds are sharply inconveniencing both the victim and the perpetrator for the same 20 years. And who says the law doesn’t have a sense of humor—and of the absurd.


  • advertisement

    Leave a Reply

    Newsletter

    Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly newsletter, with urgent bulletins as news merits.
    advertisement

    Most Recent Comments

    Kill All The Passwords

    This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack. The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host - such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog. In these environments, the odds of the "password file" being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker. With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough. Passwords aren't dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly. Read more...
    The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis. Read more...