Discover: Contactless Payment Sticker Users Inadvertently Crippling Performance
Written by Fred J. AunJanuary 14th, 2010
In a cruel twist of fate, hapless contactless payment supporters (a dying breed if ever there was one) were swiped by some more bad news this week, courtesy of a new report from Discover Financial Services. It seems that in a trial of its Zip contactless payment program, most consumers tried to hide the stickers inside their phones, a move that unintentionally cripples performance.
According to a copy of a report that Discover prepared about its initial trial results, 69 percent of those participating in the Zip trial wanted the sticker hidden. "The pilot management team was impressed by the creativity demonstrated by participants in finding various ways of hiding stickers under the phone’s protective case ("skin”), under the battery cover and other unseen yet convenient locations."
This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.
Already a Subscriber? Login Here
One Comment | Read Discover: Contactless Payment Sticker Users Inadvertently Crippling Performance
Leave a Reply
Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

-Christine

January 19th, 2010 at 6:21 pm
Note that 4 cm is actually 1.57 inches, not 2 inches. So in some cases, the working range of the RFID sticker outperformed the specifications.