<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discover: Contactless Payment Sticker Users Inadvertently Crippling Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/discover-contactless-payment-sticker-users-typically-hide-the-stickers-inadvertently-crippling-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/discover-contactless-payment-sticker-users-typically-hide-the-stickers-inadvertently-crippling-performance/</link>
	<description>Techniques, Tools and Tirades about Retail Technology and E-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 01:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSG</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/discover-contactless-payment-sticker-users-typically-hide-the-stickers-inadvertently-crippling-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-64356</link>
		<dc:creator>RSG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/?p=4547#comment-64356</guid>
		<description>Note that 4 cm is actually 1.57 inches, not 2 inches. So in some cases, the working range of the RFID sticker outperformed the specifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that 4 cm is actually 1.57 inches, not 2 inches. So in some cases, the working range of the RFID sticker outperformed the specifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

