advertisement
advertisement


This is page 2 of:

FTC To ControlScan: Your Web Site Security Seals Are Lies

March 2nd, 2010
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Thursday (Feb. 25) screamed "the Emperor has no clothes" by reporting to consumers that one of the largest firms issuing "Verified Secure Breach Protection" seals doesn’t really verify much at all. The practical impact of the ruling for E-Commerce sites is unclear, both because the FTC has little authority to enforce its rulings and because consumers have typically been impressively apathetic about security and privacy issues.

The settlement against five-year-old ControlScan said that "contrary to the statements" ControlScan made to retailers, the company "in many instances conducted little or no verification of the privacy and/or security protections for consumer information provided by companies displaying its Business Background Reviewed, Registered Member, Privacy Protected and Privacy Reviewed seals. Instead, in many instances, ControlScan provided the Registered Member seal to a company that failed to qualify for the Verified Secure seal because an electronic scan of its Web site identified an actual or potential severe vulnerability on the Web site and permitted the company to display the seal indefinitely while taking no action to assess whether the company was working to resolve any vulnerability identified by the Web site scan."

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

One Comment | Read FTC To ControlScan: Your Web Site Security Seals Are Lies

  1. Joseph A'Deo Says:

    It really is a shame that security seals are receiving such a bad rap, because in the hands of a stellar e-security company they really CAN make a difference. I work in this space (as an online evangelist for VeriSign) and see a lot of various trust seals on the market that do a host of different things, but not all are worth their salt, and separating the wheat from the chaff is no easy task. Seeking out testimonials from trusted consumers is an important step in the trust seal purchasing process, as is visiting sites that are protected by the seal — if you then encounter an issue the seal is supposed to address, it’s safe to assume the seal vendor is not doing what it promised to do.

    It’s just like taking your car to the mechanic–people don’t actually sit and watch their car get worked on, but if the problem persists, you can assume the mechanic didn’t fix it. This is why people take their cars to reputable shops with stringent processes and many years of experience. But if a mechanic fails to fix your car because they didn’t do something properly, it’s not fair to assume that all mechanics are crooks or poor at their job, and trust seals are no different — they’re only as good as the company that issues them.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.