advertisement
advertisement


Hawaii Web Tax Plan Makes It Into A Federal Case

Written by Evan Schuman
March 5th, 2009
While Hawaii pushes its Internet sales tax through its state legislature, it has become the latest in a long string of states trying to set rules for conducting commerce within its borders, with other states tackling everything from data privacy, payment security and RFID notifications. Of course, when it comes to global E-Commerce operations and national (and sometimes multinational) retail brick-and-mortar chains, a state's border doesn't have much meaning.

Some of the state legislation doesn't even limit itself to dictating what retailers must do while operating in their states but are setting new rules protecting the residents of that state when they happen to be shopping out-of-state or online. Do they expect cashiers at Wal-Mart to ask what state a customer lives in and then, based on the answer, change the way they handle a credit card payment?

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Hawaii Web Tax Plan Makes It Into A Federal Case

  1. James Tenser Says:

    It’s remarkable how stubborn this issue has been. After a decade of discussion, the Web remains a sales tax haven and our cowardly politicians haven’t settled on a common principle that would make the controversy go away. I wrote this in 2000 and I stand by it today:

    “The only righteous principle for determining which sales tax calculation to use for a purchase is that the law of the ship-to address must apply. Any other scheme will cause all the online retailer and catalogers to relocate to the Cayman Islands.”

    True then. True now. The states and municipalities need the sales tax income. The nation needs a level playing field. Retailers need to know where they stand. And consumers pay through the nose, as they always do.

  2. Rob Martell Says:

    e_tailers in the Caymans? Just like all the credit card companies ‘located’ in South Dakota so they can charge 30% loan shark rates.

    Sales taxes in and of themselves are wrongheaded, and just another example of politicians and advocates who want the easy way out. Sales tax is like cigarette and liquor taxes, they tax things you don’t really notice as much as you would a paycheck deduction or a require tax payment, and put reasoning in that sounds good. My state wanted to increase it from 5% to 6% and even the newspaper extolled it as ‘only a penny’ increase. Ya, sorry, but that is 20%.

    Until you have to fill out a vendor’s state sales tax returns!
    That is an expense for vendors that is never mentioned.

    There already are OVER 50 jurisdictions, if you have nexus in all states. Many states have State, County, City and Local taxes. I used to have to fill out tax forms for shipments to around 25 states and keeping up with the locations of the receiver (what county and township is this address in) was bad enough, but then there is the whole list of what is taxable and what isn’t!! It was a nightmare to keep track of, and try to program.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.