advertisement
advertisement


JCPenney, Wet Seal: The Arguments For Keeping Gonzalez Mystery Merchants Secret

Written by Brooklynne Kelly Peters and Evan Schuman
March 26th, 2010
JCPenney and Wet Seal were both officially added to the list of Albert Gonzalez’s retail victims on Friday (March 26) when U.S. District Court Judge Douglas P. Woodlock refused to continue their cloak of secrecy and unsealed their names. StorefrontBacktalk reported last August that the $17 billion JCPenney chain was one of Gonzalez’s victims.

But the $561 million chain Wet Seal, which has 504 stores in 47 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, kept its identity secret. No more, though, and that’s the way Woodlock wanted it.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

5 Comments | Read JCPenney, Wet Seal: The Arguments For Keeping Gonzalez Mystery Merchants Secret

  1. Tom Mahoney Says:

    It’s about time the information was made public. Kudos to Judge Woodlock.

  2. Roo Lin Says:

    This sounds like salvos in a war between the elected government and the corporate government that really rules this country.

  3. Robert L Santuci Jr. Says:

    I cannot believe how arrogant JC Penney was!

  4. MISdudeE Says:

    Yeah it’s public and likely known about to those in a IT security profession, but already forgotten about in the main public arena. Not to mention I’m willing to bet that new information like this will be overlooked by the media and won’t be considered a headline. Prove me wrong though and you’ll make me smile.

  5. Lee Says:

    What an odd little poem – “Oklahoma ligno and lithograph” – I’m impressed the judge pulled that one out.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.