advertisement
advertisement


This is page 2 of:

Kill All The Passwords

August 26th, 2010
It's time to kill all the passwords. That's the only real conclusion to draw from the work being done by Georgia Tech Research Institute researchers, who are using off-the-shelf graphics-processing cards to crack passwords by brute force. The time required to break an eight-character password: two minutes. A seven-character password--the minimum currently required by PCI-DSS for retailers to protect stored payment-card information--goes in seconds. One of the Georgia Tech researchers, Richard Boyd, called seven-character passwords "hopelessly inadequate."

In short, password security is no longer security. The clock isn't just ticking on every retailer's favorite cheap authentication scheme, it has run out. The answer isn't longer passwords; that's just a stopgap, and even if it works, it won't hold for long. Maybe Chip-and-PIN employee ID cards would do the trick. Even a mag-stripe-and-PIN approach could work. But whatever replaces passwords has to be cheap. And it must have a reasonable chance of keeping the bad guys away from information such as card data.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read Kill All The Passwords

  1. Joe G. Says:

    The possibilities you describe are years away from being implemented at best, so for the moment passwords are an ugly reality. Luckily, password managers can easily manage hundreds of passwords of any length. The only thing a user needs to remember is the master password. It seems like an easier task to educate users on how to use password managers rather than implement complex security technology on a global basis.

    Here’s the simplest way to manage passwords:

    Use a password manager to assign unique, random 15 characters for all accounts, protecting them with a strong master password. Once you get into the habit of it, it’s actually faster than how most people login to various accounts each day.

    I recently posted a series on password management that highlights this simple solution to the problem, while also giving more background to those who want it (how attackers steal passwords, which password managers are best, etc.):

    http://www.filterjoe.com/2010/05/14/password-management-for-the-average-joe/

  2. Jay Libove, CISSP, CIPP Says:

    This article does mention, but does not give enough attention to, the fact that the attacks discussed are only feasible when the encrypted password file can be copied and subjected to an offline attack.

    The trick is to have authentication performed on a separate, much more strongly secured host – such as an Active Directory Domain Controller, or a Kerberos server, or a NIS+ server, or even using something as banal as an LDAP-over-SSL authentication dialog.

    In these environments, the odds of the “password file” being stolen and subjected to an offline attack go to near zero, and only online attacks may be carried out by the attacker.

    With sensible exponential backoff between failed password attempts, lockout after a modest number of failed attempts on a single account, and pattern detection, that minimum 7 character password is quite secure enough.

    Passwords aren’t dead yet for security purposes, and they will be with us for a very long while to come for practical purposes. The trick is to employ them correctly.

  3. Nicholas Shaw Says:

    What the article does not cover are passphrases. Specifically, instead of using lengthy passwords use lengthy passphrases which a user is likely to remember. If I were a pilot (I’m not) I might use:

    !_l0ve_fly!ng_my_Cessina

    That’s 24 characters. Each word is separated by an underscore, each “i” is replaced by a “!” and each “o” is replaced by a zero (0) and at least one word is capitalized. This is a secure passphrase. In reality, I would expect someone to NOT use a passphrase to which they could be associated. :-)

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...
The ETA recently launched the Certified Payment Professional program, which charges $425 for non-members to take the test, assuming they meet the 'experience' requirement, to PROVE they are a professional. And they'll have to take it every 3 years. Worthy program, but high cost. Plus, only a select few were allowed to be in the first class, and there are only 4 test windows per year currently. So being on the registry simply means, you were lucky enough to get picked, nothing to do with skill level. Read more...
@Cory: Thanks for your comment and question about the pricing of the QIR training. I raised that question in a conversation with Bob Russo last week, and I will address it in a follow-up column in a few days. While the pricing is not yet set, hopefully it will not be too great a burden for you or other integrators/resellers. We'll have to see, though. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.