advertisement
advertisement


Tablets For Checkout? Yeah, Let’s Throw The Chain Under A Truck

Written by Evan Schuman
January 20th, 2011
Was thumbing through an IHL Group survey report on retail hardware released this week when one number caught my attention: Some 52 percent of specialty retailers plan to issue tablet computers to associates by the 2011 holiday shopping season. That is barely nine months from now. Whether that number is more frightening than amusing to you, however, most likely reveals the department you work for. First, people tend to interpret surveys in a much too generous manner. Is the surveyed person saying what they want or what they're likely to get? Or—please forgive the cynicism—they will often give as answers the results they want their bosses to read in the final report.

Let's set all of that aside for the moment and assume that the results are actually going to happen. (Even IHL President Greg Buzek said the results were about twice as high as what he expected.) Are retailers ready for a flood of these devices in the hands of associates?

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

4 Comments | Read Tablets For Checkout? Yeah, Let’s Throw The Chain Under A Truck

  1. Richard Nedwich Says:

    Good questions posed, but there are some lessons learned to help those retailers with the desire (foolish or brave) to move ahead with a tablet or smartphone deployment strategy:

    1. Wireless LAN networks can provide mobility without dependency on roof, thunderstorm, or carrier. This approach also allows for centralized device management and security.
    2. Historically, mobile computing device vendors who standardized on MS WinCE did so precisely in response to retailer demand to lock down the screen to only “business apps” — no solitaire, no Start button, or general internet access

    WLAN capability, reliability, management and security have come a long way (e.g., 801.11n, virtualization) but in my opinion, device management and compliance issues will likely always remain, in one form or another.

  2. Tom Redd Says:

    Good points but at the speed in which technology is moving and retailer’s desire to better serve there shoppers in any way possible I am confident that we will see many retail associates with some form of a Shopper Service “Pad” by December. Could this impact your great newsletter? Cause a shift from StoreFront to “PadfrontBacktalk”?

  3. Steven Kostrzewski Says:

    You raise a lot of great questions and all of your concerns should certainly be considered by a retailer when pursuing wireless, mobile solutions for improving their business.

    I only have one question in response: If Apple, one of the most secretive tech companies out there, can securely implement a mobile payment solution in their stores then why are you so convinced that this will be an impossible feat for other retailers?

    If any challenge exists, it seems it would be related to integrating the plethora of legacy systems that have been pieced together over the years at some retailers. That challenge, however is not specific to wireless networks, tablet deployments or mobile payments.

  4. Evan Schuman Says:

    Not sure why you think I’m “so convinced that this will be an impossible feat for other retailers” given that I absolutely believe that it’s going to happen and quite soon. The point is that many chains are moving ahead too quickly, before they have had a chance to factor in all of the issues they’ll need to work out.
    Apple’s accomplishment is impressive, but they were doing all internal development and it was an impressively proprietary approach with a very disciplined workforce. What today’s chains are being pitched–by a large number of vendors–is a third-party approach, being billed as seamless and–gulp–turnkey. That’s where problems will come from. Apple’s payment approach was expensive and it took a long time to test. Say what you will about Apple, they are disciplined.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...
The ETA recently launched the Certified Payment Professional program, which charges $425 for non-members to take the test, assuming they meet the 'experience' requirement, to PROVE they are a professional. And they'll have to take it every 3 years. Worthy program, but high cost. Plus, only a select few were allowed to be in the first class, and there are only 4 test windows per year currently. So being on the registry simply means, you were lucky enough to get picked, nothing to do with skill level. Read more...
@Cory: Thanks for your comment and question about the pricing of the QIR training. I raised that question in a conversation with Bob Russo last week, and I will address it in a follow-up column in a few days. While the pricing is not yet set, hopefully it will not be too great a burden for you or other integrators/resellers. We'll have to see, though. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.