|
The new version of PCI due out in October will let the outdated WEP wireless security standard stick around for almost two more years, while also reducing the required frequency of firewall rule reviews. But the changes confirmed by the PCI Security Standards Council this week—which have been circulated among members for the last few weeks—provide few other substantive changes besides delivering the mild tweaks and updates the council has publicly promised. The document lists some 30 changes to the current PCI Version 1.1, and PCI officials promise that the official and final version—now slated for release on Oct. 1, a few weeks earlier than originally expected—will include yet more changes. Read more. |
August 25th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
I find Bob Russo’s quote interesting “There’s a lot of expense for a merchant. We had feedback from some merchants that it would cause them some stress.” I guess web merchants have not provided feedback to the council. PCI 6.6 states:
6.6 Ensure that all web-facing applications are protected against known attacks by applying either of the following methods:
• Having all custom application code reviewed for common vulnerabilities by an organization that specializes in application security
• Installing an application layer firewall in front of web-facing applications.
A very high percentage of web sites are custom and a very high percentage of these sites use third party hosting providers. Most hosting providers will not install an application layer firewall so option #2 is out (besides, ALF’s may introduce bigger security holes than they solve). Option #1 can be costly as a one time fee if the site is very static and very costly as an ongoing if the site changes regularly. Also, since “organizations that specializes in application security” are not regulated in anyway, a merchant’s experience may range from a less qualified organization overlooking the common vulnerabilities they are hired to find, to the organization contributing to a breach due to the thin grey line between white hatters and black hatters (ethical hackers vs. unethical hackers).