Rethinking Payment Security Outsourcing
Written by David TaylorJune 3rd, 2009
Is it justifiable to implement a less secure technology if employees’ jobs are preserved in the process? GuestView PCI Columnist David Taylor has noticed a “protectionism” trend when it comes to the outsourcing of payment management for the purpose of reducing PCI compliance scope.
"We're talking about companies opting to store and manage more credit card and other confidential data than necessary, and we suspect protecting jobs in technology, compliance and finance is the main reason for this," Taylor writes. "But is this necessarily bad?"
This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.
Already a Subscriber? Login Here
Pages: 1 2
Leave a Reply
Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.
Is there really an improvement between a mag swipe and contactless tap if multi-factor authentication is required?
-Ed
