advertisement
advertisement


Sears’ Christmas Spyware Surprise

Written by Evan Schuman
January 3rd, 2008
Did Sears conclude that the only accurate way to see what consumers were truly doing online was to track customers who didn't know they were being tracked? The $53 billion retailer isn't disputing that it did distribute spyware, but merely that consumers knew that they were agreeing to spyware.

But the chain is also learning that the online world—with its thousands of bloggers armed with screen captures—is fairly unforgiving when it comes to marketing excesses.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

6 Comments | Read Sears’ Christmas Spyware Surprise

  1. Mark Eaton Says:

    Sears: Shame on you. One would think that we learned something from the TJX fiasco. What happened to a once great company? I remember getting excited at the chance to go to Sears with my Dad on Saturday mornings. We’d peruse the Tool isles, check out the new gadgets Hardware & Appliances and say Hi to the Sales Clerks we had known for years. Maybe buy a couple of tools and some jeans or sneakers and stop at McDonalds on the way home. I wouldn’t be caught dead in a Sears store today. They never have to same person in Tools or Hardware, jeans are way overpriced unless they’re on sale and they never have my size in sneakers or shoes (11-1/2 Wide). It is an unacceptable buying experience. Sears Management got rid of all the old timers that really knew the department, replacing them with Teens that can’t make change. They used to have a register in each department, replaced them with “checkout kiosks”, went back to department checkout and now they have “centrally located” checkout…? I get the impression that Sears hired a bunch of MBA’s with sharp pencils and not a clue about what it takes to keep loyal Customers and little by little alienated them with all these weird changes…none of which appears to have saved them any money. Sears is a ship lost at sea and no navigation plan….

  2. Paula Rosenblum Says:

    Always one to investigate the latest in retail technology, when invited, I started to install and download Sears’ software. Of course I didn’t read the agreement in full either.

    Fortunately, my malware protection program (Norton Internet Security, and no this is not an endorsement…just a fact) warned me that I was about to install software that would monitor my keystrokes. That was all I needed to know.

    I was shocked and just shook my head. This is customer-centricity? My goodness.

  3. Ms. Mayfield Says:

    The story is very informative and will certainly make me pay closer attention to these types of online agreements and disclaimers. But the story doesnt mention whether the software is removable, and how the average, non-technical customer can remove it from their computer.

  4. David Pava Says:

    This is a classic example of a breach in corporate ethics; it remind me of the episode a few years ago when UPS made available a new version of their shipping software — and if you downloaded it your homepage was changed to UPS and a slew of UPS related shortcuts added to your desktop. At least in that case, one could see how they were being victimized. In this case with Sears it seems every effort was made to conceal the truth.

  5. kathryn milette Says:

    great article. it’s my sense that despite the growing acknowledgment that companies need to be more open and transparent in their communications, it either hasn’t yet really sunk in to large corporation mindsets, or that large corporations have a complex infrastructure that makes it difficult to make these necessary changes. I mean, who reads the fine print (except for Harvard professors?!)

  6. Jimbo Says:

    Sears should be taken to task for this breach of confidence. There has been enough written about spyware for them to realize that the vast majority of people who signed up with this program would never approve of spyware being placed on their computer. What’s even more difficult for me to understand is that they also must have known that someone would eventually figure this out and expose the whole sordid mess. Shame on them.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.