<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Limits Customers Talking With Each Other</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/setting-limits-on-customers-talking-with-each-other-in-e-commerce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/setting-limits-on-customers-talking-with-each-other-in-e-commerce/</link>
	<description>Techniques, Tools and Tirades about Retail Technology and E-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill bittner</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/setting-limits-on-customers-talking-with-each-other-in-e-commerce/comment-page-1/#comment-68265</link>
		<dc:creator>bill bittner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/?p=4933#comment-68265</guid>
		<description>I actually like this idea, especially when I am buying my x rated videos ... no need for the seller to know my real e-mail  (just kidding).

My only comment is that I believe the discussion of “unnecessary contacts during claims investigations.” misses the point.  I think Amazon is saying that if they are confident they have all the exchanges that occured between a buyer and seller there is no need to go back to either to gather additional information.  Amazon already has everything that should be needed to resolve the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like this idea, especially when I am buying my x rated videos &#8230; no need for the seller to know my real e-mail  (just kidding).</p>
<p>My only comment is that I believe the discussion of “unnecessary contacts during claims investigations.” misses the point.  I think Amazon is saying that if they are confident they have all the exchanges that occured between a buyer and seller there is no need to go back to either to gather additional information.  Amazon already has everything that should be needed to resolve the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

