|
GuestView Columnist David Taylor thinks of logging and envisions Rodney Dangerfield. “Whether we’re talking about logs generated by network or application firewalls, intrusion detection systems, file integrity monitor tools or the operating systems themselves, I’ve come to the conclusion that the only people who don’t hate them are the vendors who sell them. But, whether we hate them, disrespect them or merely ignore them, we need to learn to live with them.” Read more. |
June 23rd, 2008 at 5:58 pm
David’s insights mirror what we’ve seen working with hundreds of mid-market enterprises facing regulatory compliance pressures. At Interop Las Vegas, the top priority that PCI auditors shared with us was the ability of SIEM technology to correlate events - which they admitted is a common failing among many retail organizations.
As David states, not only is it impractical (if not impossible) to analyze logs manually, but you need insight to identify sophisticated attacks that cross multiple platforms. The fact is, log management systems with Google-like search engines and hundreds of reports still lack event correlation, meaning the focus will be on reactive forensic analysis.
The goal of PCI, and many other compliance initiatives, is prevention. Real-time analysis, event correlation, notification and response technology gives companies the opportunity to be proactive and detect suspicious behaviors linked to data loss. It’s clear that at least some PCI auditors are now looking beyond log management and asking merchants to demonstrate their ability to correlate events across all monitored systems, software and users.