<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TJX Revises Consumer Settlement, Agrees To Pay Cash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/tjx-revises-consumer-settlement-agrees-to-pay-cash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/tjx-revises-consumer-settlement-agrees-to-pay-cash/</link>
	<description>Techniques, Tools and Tirades about Retail Technology and E-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 01:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Schuman</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/tjx-revises-consumer-settlement-agrees-to-pay-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-18983</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Schuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/tjx-revises-consumer-settlement-agrees-to-pay-cash/#comment-18983</guid>
		<description>Editor&#039;s Note: Actually, TJX&#039;s proposed settlement has its own area for whatever time a consumer can prove was spent chasing down things to fix the credit problem. But it had a low cap (http://storefrontbacktalk.com/story/092207TJXsettlement.php) &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; it assumed that consumers&#039; time was worth only $10/hour.
One lawyer involved defended the hourly, saying that it was presumably time spent at home that would not have otherwise been billed at a corporate rate. Maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor&#8217;s Note: Actually, TJX&#8217;s proposed settlement has its own area for whatever time a consumer can prove was spent chasing down things to fix the credit problem. But it had a low cap (<a href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/story/092207TJXsettlement.php" rel="nofollow">http://storefrontbacktalk.com/story/092207TJXsettlement.php</a>) <i>and</i> it assumed that consumers&#8217; time was worth only $10/hour.<br />
One lawyer involved defended the hourly, saying that it was presumably time spent at home that would not have otherwise been billed at a corporate rate. Maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RabidWolf</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/tjx-revises-consumer-settlement-agrees-to-pay-cash/comment-page-1/#comment-18982</link>
		<dc:creator>RabidWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/tjx-revises-consumer-settlement-agrees-to-pay-cash/#comment-18982</guid>
		<description>Oh, this is a total crock. $30 vouchers for merchandise that already didn&#039;t sell at &#039;suggested retail&#039;? They won&#039;t have my size, or anything I like anyway! 
And now, perhaps, the time money I had to spend to get a new credit card and number, repair anything that may have automatically used the old number, etcetera, is worth $15? What is that per hour? 37 cents?

I am totally disgusted. At least the lawyers are happy.

RW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, this is a total crock. $30 vouchers for merchandise that already didn&#8217;t sell at &#8216;suggested retail&#8217;? They won&#8217;t have my size, or anything I like anyway!<br />
And now, perhaps, the time money I had to spend to get a new credit card and number, repair anything that may have automatically used the old number, etcetera, is worth $15? What is that per hour? 37 cents?</p>
<p>I am totally disgusted. At least the lawyers are happy.</p>
<p>RW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

