advertisement
advertisement

Wine Kiosks May Be Coming Up Empty In Pennsylvania

Written by Frank Hayes
August 24th, 2011

The great wine-vending kiosk experiment may be just about over, at least in Pennsylvania. Last week (Aug. 15), Wal-Mart told the state’s Liquor Control Board that the retail giant is no longer interested in putting the 10-foot-high machines in 23 of its Pennsylvania stores. That comes after the June announcement by grocery chain Wegmans that it was pulling the giant vending machines out of its 10 stores that had them. And the state now says that if the kiosks’ developer, Simple Brands LLC, doesn’t come up with a $1 million payment by September 19, the plug will be pulled on the remaining 21 machines.

The wine kiosks were an interesting idea, but they may simply have been impossible to get right. There were ongoing mechanical problems (all the machines were taken off-line for repairs temporarily in December) and liability issues, in addition to concerns about whether minors could be blocked effectively from buying wine by the kiosks’ technology for matching a buyer’s face to his driver’s license. But the biggest problem may still be that wine buyers generally like to browse wine labels before making a decision—not buy wine from a glorified Coke machine.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Wine Kiosks May Be Coming Up Empty In Pennsylvania

  1. ed Says:

    The vending machine I saw on SimpleBrands web site was a big monster of a machine that may work in large Asian megacities but not in Pennsylvania.

    These US-based vending/self-checkout systems keep trying to incorporate the shopping and fulfillment experience into the automated process and this is the major flaw in the design of these systems.

    You are correct, people want to hold a bottle of wine, browse the shelves for wines before purchasing. Even if this wine vending was to work, it would only have worked in a more sophisiticated city like Seattle or Portland or Vancouver or Toronto in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...
The ETA recently launched the Certified Payment Professional program, which charges $425 for non-members to take the test, assuming they meet the 'experience' requirement, to PROVE they are a professional. And they'll have to take it every 3 years. Worthy program, but high cost. Plus, only a select few were allowed to be in the first class, and there are only 4 test windows per year currently. So being on the registry simply means, you were lucky enough to get picked, nothing to do with skill level. Read more...
@Cory: Thanks for your comment and question about the pricing of the QIR training. I raised that question in a conversation with Bob Russo last week, and I will address it in a follow-up column in a few days. While the pricing is not yet set, hopefully it will not be too great a burden for you or other integrators/resellers. We'll have to see, though. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.