 |
TJX Revises Consumer Settlement, Agrees To Pay Cash
Written by Evan Schuman
October 9, 2007
Hours before a federal judge demanded that TJX address key concerns about its proposed settlement, the merchant behind the biggest retail data breach ever agreed to some key changes, including offering a cash alternative to its voucher offer.
The biggest objection to the initial proposed settlement had been that consumer victims were only offered $30 vouchers for making purchases at TJX. Under a new proposed settlement that was filed late Tuesday, attorneys for both sides are now proposing giving consumers a choice: either the $30 voucher or a $15 check.
The concern behind the voucher-only deal is that TJX was using the settlement as a way to potentially boost sales, relying on consumers to buy more than $30 worth of merchandise. The new proposal still makes the vouchers seem twice as compelling as the checks, but by offering a cash alternative, the proposal is more likely to get the approval of U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young.
Young expressed serious misgivings about the first settlement proposal, especially because of the vouchers. Attorneys for both sides are due to report to Young on Wednesday.
Another change involves an initially proposed 3-day say, which has now been reduced to a one-day sale "with extended hours from 8 AM to 10 PM," according to court filing.
In an attempt to respond to a court order to quantify the settlement more, TJX officials revealed some of their internal cost projections. The total amount of vouchers is no longer subject to any cap while the cash payments will be capped at $7 million. TJX said that they have agreed to reimburse some consumers for any hard losses of more than $60 resulting from identity theft, with a $1 million ceiling.
The credit watch that TJX said would be offered to some consumers will bring about $177 million of value to the consumer, the revised settlement proposal said. As for the cost of that provision, TJX said that "a regular consumer unaffiliated with the TJX class action would have to pay $389.95 for the package.
The agreement argued that the fact that TJX is likely getting a bulk-rate discount is irrelevant because "an individual consumer could not get the discounted rate obtained by TJX for the bulk purchase, and many consumers do not even know such credit monitoring and identity theft insurance exists or how to get it. In any event, this benefit should be viewed from the perspective of the greater value received by the Class and not by the lesser cost borne by Defendants."
As for the national sale that will now be a single day, TJX reports the "value" to consumers of the event will be $10.5 million because "TJX estimates that its average gross sales for a Thursday, Friday or Saturday in January, February, or July 2008 will be approximately $54 million. TJX further estimates that the Special Event will increase sales above the average anywhere from approximately 20 percent to 30 percent, and potentially as high as approximately 40 percent. Assuming a 30 percent increase in sales, then a 15 percent discount would equal approximately $10.5 million."
But TJX also argued that, far from being a windfall for the retailer, it would amount to a loss. "TJX's average profit margin on its aggregate sales is approximately 7 percent. Thus, the 15 percent discount offered in the Special Event is more than double TJX's profit margin. Thus, the 15 percent discount will result in a direct loss - not mere lost profit - to TJX. In sum, the Special Event confers a substantial benefit on Class members at a significant cost to TJX."
The document didn't address the probability that many consumers attending this event could purchase substantially more at a later non-discounted date. That's why discount days are a popular marketing tactic for enticing new prospective customers to try the store.
The revised settlement also increased the amount of time consumers will have to act on this offer, from the original 60 days to the 90 days the judge had suggested. The document also argued that Judge Young does have the authority to rule on this settlement on behalf of Canadian consumers. |
|
 |
Advertisement
 |
Evan Schuman is the former retail technology editor for eWEEK.com, PCMagazine, CIOInsight and retail reporter for RISNews and Consumer Goods Technology. Having covered IT issues for 21 years - and other stuff like legal affairs, politics, Wall Street and the environment for about eight years before that - Schuman is in a good position to gripe about technology trends and sometimes accidentally make a good point.
|
 |
 |
Sears.com Melts Down On Black Friday, But Costco, Walmart, Saks and Kmart Have Issues, Too
Sears.com suffered the worst Web problems on Black Friday (Nov. 28), experiencing a series of complete site crashes for much of the day. Although no other major retailer came close, according to preliminary reports, many of the industry's largest merchants suffered site slowdowns or other Web problems, including Walmart, Kmart, Saks, Overstock, Amazon, Target, Kohl's, Costco and Buy.com.
|
|
 |
|
 |