advertisement
advertisement


This is page 2 of:

In A First, Google Does Real-time Joint Retail Trials

March 18th, 2010
In the 15 or so years that we've had E-Commerce, the industry has seen quite a few improvements, but nothing that radically changed the way people shopped or retailers sold. Local inventory search, which today is not even in its infancy (not really even embryonic; it's more like a zygote), is likely to be the first truly dramatic shift.

Last Thursday (March 11), Google made a major—albeit extremely preliminary—move into local inventory search through a deal with a handful of major chains: Best Buy, Sears, Williams Sonoma, Pottery Barn and the Vitamin Shoppe. But instead of working out this process internally and then bringing in retailers—or the reverse, with retailers figuring it out first—Google's objective is to run the earliest stage tests with various chains "so we're both learning how to do this in parallel," said Paul Lee, Google Product Search's business product manager.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

5 Comments | Read In A First, Google Does Real-time Joint Retail Trials

  1. Rob Rice Says:

    Interesting and natural move for Goggle given they already plot layers (e.g restaurants, gas stations) on top of maps on mobile devices. But Google is behind Shop Savvy in this product search effort. With the Shop Savvy mobile app, you use the phone camera to scan the product package barcode (UPC, etc.) and up pops a list of web and store competitors in the area also selling the same product, for how much, with customer reviews. Both solutions support consumer control over product information using mobile technology.

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    Editor’s Note: Google also supports the barcode scan, as do many others.

  3. bill bittner Says:

    As mentioned, the key to satisfying consumer demand is “data normalization”. Normalization involves recognizing what are considered equivalent products. The challenge is that “equivalent” could mean something completely different to each consumer. You don’t need to know what the inventory is until you know what you want to buy. So before an inventory application is in place, a good product data base that allows consumers to search by product characteristics is necessary. Big retailers have already done this by allowing consumers to search by brand and major features such as LCD vs Plasma, screen size, etc. If the consumers are going to a retailer’s site to determine what they want, I am not sure how likely they are going to be to go somewhere else to screen inventory.

    Amazon seems to have recognized this, combining a lot of the searching with links to various online retailers besides themselves. To that point, Amazon seems a better place to meet consumer demand for this type of service. Small brick and mortar retailers can load their inventory onto Amazon.

    But in any case, the challenge is to avoid disappointing a consumer who jumps in their car and arrives at the store only to find the inventory is wrong or has been depleted.

  4. Evan Schuman Says:

    Goog point, Bill. All such displays should have a default note in prominent type: “Please call first.” On a mobile app–or just a site accessed via a mobile device–that can even be a link to the store’s listed phone number.

  5. Tom Stegmann Says:

    This may be more of a question… Recently launched POS SaaS offerings for small and mid-sized retailers (brick&mortar and webfront) are being reasonably quickly adopted. The retailer’s inventory is stored in the POS system on a “cloud server”, usually identified by the manufacturer’s SKU/barcode.

    SMB inventory aggregating sites (e-stores)over the years have often required their own inventory recording in addition to the retailer’s own POS system. This never works.

    However, if it was relatively simple to integrate an SMB SaaS POS system with a major search site like what Google is doing–wouldn’t that solve the problem of hyper local inventory discovery and management?

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.