advertisement
advertisement


In Alternative Payment Fight, Amazon Wants To Reverse Google’s Move

Written by Evan Schuman
May 4th, 2009
With the E-Commerce alternative payments space heating up, the market is getting ready for a nasty fight for third-place between Google and Amazon. EBay's two contenders in the race—PayPal and BillMeLater—are now essentially tied with each other for having the most large retailers as clients.

Google hasn't been faring especially well, with some seeing Google's move in April to boost prices as desperate. Then on Thursday (April 30), Amazon counterpounched, offering to waive fees for five months for retailers who would be new customers for its Amazon Payments program. The Amazon offer was quite limited, excluding any existing consumers, having the fee waiver only lasts five months (from April 29 through Sept. 30). Technically, it would be five months for those who signed up immediately. The deal isn't for five free months, it's free transactions until Sept. 30, apparently regardless of when a merchant signs up. The deal also has an especially low ceiling, with Amazon saying that the fees will start sooner than Sept. 30 if $2 million or more is sold.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read In Alternative Payment Fight, Amazon Wants To Reverse Google’s Move

  1. RK Says:

    The 80-20 rule applies here. 80% of transactions on Internet happen on 20% of sites. These sites are very large merchants. They would not be interested in Amazon offer since the ceiling is very low (2 million) for them. Some of them are so huge that they will reach the ceiling within a day. Amazon needs to concentrate on Kindle than a payment system.

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    Editor’s Note: Not necessarily. If a payment service can strongly (or even overwhelmingly) dominate that 20 percent, that’s a huge and very profitable situation.
    P.S. Based on the figures we’re seeing, not so certain the 80/20 numbers still hold. There are a ton of small sites out there doing well in their niches.

  3. Greg Says:

    The 80/20 rule is what the book “long tail” was all about. There are so many people, in this case businesses and purchases, in the 80% outside the top that if a company can dominate there they could make more than if they just compete in the top 20%.

    The 80/20 rule is slowly becoming less of a factor because of the internet. More people are spreading out more and more which isn’t getting rid of the top sites/companies but it is spreading the sales so the top sites/companies are seeing less while the end of the tail (the bottom %) are seeing more.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.