advertisement
advertisement

JCPenney’s Destroyed Products Have To Count For Something

Written by Frank Hayes
July 11th, 2010

How do inventory systems handle items that employees are required to intentionally destroy? That’s the problem for JCPenney, which, it turns out, is contractually obligated to throw out unsold merchandise from its American Living brand. The requirement has been part of the retailer’s deal with Polo Ralph Lauren, which designed the products, and was presumably created so the pricey products wouldn’t end up with discounters, thereby devaluing the brand. (The retailer now says the deal will be changed so unsold merchandise can be donated or liquidated, which is standard practice.)

But that leaves open the question of how a retailer’s inventory systems are supposed to deal with such oddball requirements. Every retailer deals with inventory losses: Grocers have spoiled chickens; bookstores have damaged paperbacks; and everyone has theft. Although it all gets rolled up on the balance sheet as lost inventory, accountants like to know exactly what happened. Spoiled? Stolen? Damaged? Intentionally destroyed? No matter what it is, IT better have a transaction code. Just remember, whenever a retailer cuts a supplier deal with unusual conditions, sooner or later someone in IT will have to sort it out.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.