<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;This Is Costco Calling. Put Down That Sandwich!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storefrontbacktalk.com/supply-chain/this-is-costco-calling-put-down-that-sandwich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/supply-chain/this-is-costco-calling-put-down-that-sandwich/</link>
	<description>Techniques, Tools and Tirades about Retail Technology and E-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Hall</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/supply-chain/this-is-costco-calling-put-down-that-sandwich/comment-page-1/#comment-53934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/?p=2297#comment-53934</guid>
		<description>Dick&#039;s Sporting Goods chain did this too - they not only notified me of the recall via EMAIL and a card in the mail but also the info I needed to file a claim. The recall was on a lazy recliner and replacement parts were available.  Dicks managed this perfectly...otherwise the chair tended to break which could have caused back pain and / or other injury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick&#8217;s Sporting Goods chain did this too &#8211; they not only notified me of the recall via EMAIL and a card in the mail but also the info I needed to file a claim. The recall was on a lazy recliner and replacement parts were available.  Dicks managed this perfectly&#8230;otherwise the chair tended to break which could have caused back pain and / or other injury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Eppstein</title>
		<link>http://storefrontbacktalk.com/supply-chain/this-is-costco-calling-put-down-that-sandwich/comment-page-1/#comment-53780</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Eppstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/?p=2297#comment-53780</guid>
		<description>I wish Sams Club followed this practice. A month ago my wife and I purchased a platter of baklava from the Same store in Maumee, Ohio. She ate several pieces but it seemed tainted and gave her diarrhea, so she threw it out. A few days ago we received a first class letter from Same Club reporting that some of this product was contaminated with salmonella. We were asked to return it to the store for a refund. We took in the letter, but the Customer Service staffer explained that we needed to also return either the month-old receipt (which we didn&#039;t have) or the unused product or wrapper (which we had thrown away a month ago.) We pointed out that their computer wrote us so they knew we had purchased the baklava; it was unreasonable for us to keep all of our receipts for months or still retain the wrapper or product. Sorry, they said. Despite the letter, no $10 refund. It seemed to us that the formal notification of possible salmonella poisoning was not in good faith; it was just a way to comply with the law but not actually give many customers an actual refund. So much for Sam&#039;s Club. Does the FDA need to hear about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Sams Club followed this practice. A month ago my wife and I purchased a platter of baklava from the Same store in Maumee, Ohio. She ate several pieces but it seemed tainted and gave her diarrhea, so she threw it out. A few days ago we received a first class letter from Same Club reporting that some of this product was contaminated with salmonella. We were asked to return it to the store for a refund. We took in the letter, but the Customer Service staffer explained that we needed to also return either the month-old receipt (which we didn&#8217;t have) or the unused product or wrapper (which we had thrown away a month ago.) We pointed out that their computer wrote us so they knew we had purchased the baklava; it was unreasonable for us to keep all of our receipts for months or still retain the wrapper or product. Sorry, they said. Despite the letter, no $10 refund. It seemed to us that the formal notification of possible salmonella poisoning was not in good faith; it was just a way to comply with the law but not actually give many customers an actual refund. So much for Sam&#8217;s Club. Does the FDA need to hear about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

