advertisement
advertisement


Visa Classifies Corporate Franchisors As Third-Party Agents

Written by Walter Conway
November 11th, 2010
Last week, Visa officially brought corporate franchisors into the world of Level 1 merchant service providers by requiring them to register as Third-Party Agents, with all that that implies. At one level, the increased visibility, attention to PCI compliance and stricter validation regime should reduce data breaches at unsecure franchise locations. At least, that is the plan. Also interesting is that in taking this step Visa has weighed in on the systems considered to be in scope for corporate franchisors' PCI compliance, even if they never store, process or transmit any cardholder information.

PCI Columnist Walt Conway has to ask, though, whether it is possible that Visa's effort might have the unintended and clearly undesired consequence of actually reducing franchisee security—at least in some situations. That might happen if corporate franchisors segment their networks in an effort to bypass the new program and its increased costs. The decisions corporate franchisors make in the coming months could determine the ultimate effectiveness of Visa's well-intentioned effort to reduce data compromises and increase PCI compliance among franchise locations.

This Story Is Only Available For Premium Subscribers. Click Or Login In Below To Read The Rest Of This Story.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Visa Classifies Corporate Franchisors As Third-Party Agents

  1. Jim Huguelet Says:

    This is, I think, a huge wake-up call for all companies that somehow interact with merchants’ retail sites. While the name of the category is “Corporate Franchisor Servicer”, I don’t see the logical distinction (if one is even meant to be implied) between a strict “franchisor” and any other third party that provides a technology service of some type to retail sites (for example, an independent POS provider that offers remote support). When you look at the terminology that says this new program encompasses anyone who “…owns or operates….connected physical and logical assets…” you have the potential to encompass a very large number of previously uncovered third parties. As such, I believe that by asking third parties that may not have a direct contractual relationship with a merchant’s acquirer (or Visa, for that matter) to register with their customers’ acquirers, “irrespective of whether Visa cardholder data is being stored, transmitted or processed”, we are entering a new phase of payment security compliance, liability, and recordkeeping.

    I doubt that this program would in practice be able to reach all of the (seemingly) covered entities anytime soon – but it feels like this is where things are headed, and those of us who are (potentially) impacted should begin to take note.

  2. Jim Huguelet Says:

    Interestingly, if you read the announcement carefully, a CFS appears to not be able to self-assess/validate their own compliance and therefore must engage a QSA – even if the merchant they are working with is of a transaction level that allows them to do so. To quote: “Members must verify that the Corporate Franchise Servicer is actively working towards (or has validated) PCI DSS compliance as a Level 1 service provider”.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Weekly, Monthly Newsletters

Quickly catch-up on the latest in E-Commerce and Retail Tech with our free weekly report, with urgent bulletins as news merits—along with our monthlies on Mobile, Security, In-Store, E-Commerce and CRM.
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

"Careless" Systems Integrators Now Directly Under PCI DSS

This exact issue has been bothering me for years, and I was JUST talking about it with someone only yesterday. This may well be my favorite article, mostly because I'm biased and have hated this particular problem forever. Read more...
Good article, but how does this have anything to do with the DSS? Read more...
Actually, the QIR program has a lot to do with the DSS (or PCI). Since merchants rely on their reseller or integrator to implement their PA-DSS validated application, these resellers and system integrators play a critical role in merchants achieving and maintaining PCI compliance. As far as I can tell, the QIR program is designed to help merchants stay compliant by making sure their payment applications are installed according to the PA-DSS Implementation Guide, for example ensuring default passwords are changed (and protected), that the data encryption keys are properly set and secured, that the merchant's data retention policy is set, that no sensitive cardholder data are stored, and often that a firewall is in place and properly configured. Read more...
Although this is a great move forward in pushing the issue of highly trained people, it is also a good marketing ploy for the council. It begs the question: How much do they stand to make? The problem for this is that for people (like myself) that are just starting out their own business venture, PCI has typically charged a premium for their training and certifications. This change will likely force those of us with less capital to spin into the abyss. I have more than 15 years in the security and compliance fields with heavy hitter certs like CISSP, CRISC, and Sec+. There should not be a guide but a free test or a pre-requisite of either the PCI cert OR other heavy hitter certs. I just don't want the good guys in small places to get flushed out. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.